[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <757f143b-0c5d-4dd9-f7a1-5450da3b86b5@bytedance.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 21:18:08 +0800
From: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] sched/fair: Improve scan efficiency of SIS
Hi Prateek, thanks very much for your solid testings!
On 2/7/23 11:42 AM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Abel,
>
> I've retested the patches with on the updated tip and the results
> are still promising.
>
> tl;dr
>
> o Hackbench sees improvements when the machine is overloaded.
> o tbench shows improvements when the machine is overloaded.
> o The unixbench regression seen previously seems to be unrelated
> to the patch as the spawn test scores are vastly different
> after a reboot/kexec for the same kernel.
> o Other benchmarks show slight improvements or are comparable to
> the numbers on tip.
Cheers! Yet I still see some minor regressions in the report
below. As we discussed last time, reducing unnecessary updates
on the idle cpumask when LLC is overloaded should help.
Thanks & Best regards,
Abel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists