[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca9c0f77-c191-d88a-22a1-315ca97f17e8@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 07:29:53 -0600
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Dąbroś <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
Grzegorz Bernacki <gjb@...ihalf.com>,
Thomas Rijo-john <Rijo-john.Thomas@....com>,
Lendacky Thomas <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] i2c: designware: Use PCI PSP driver for communication
On 2/16/23 07:27, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 2/10/23 00:38, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> Currently the PSP semaphore communication base address is discovered
>> by using an MSR that is not architecturally guaranteed for future
>> platforms. Also the mailbox that is utilized for communication with
>> the PSP may have other consumers in the kernel, so it's better to
>> make all communication go through a single driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c | 141 +-------------------
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h | 1 -
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 1 -
>> include/linux/psp-platform-access.h | 1 +
>> 5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> index a7bfddf08fa7b..9e2202ca73ec7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> @@ -566,9 +566,9 @@ config I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
>> config I2C_DESIGNWARE_AMDPSP
>> bool "AMD PSP I2C semaphore support"
>> - depends on X86_MSR
>> depends on ACPI
>> depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
>> + depends on CRYPTO_DEV_SP_PSP && !(I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y &&
>> CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD=m)
>> help
>
> Would this look better if split? I.e.
>
> depends on CRYPTO_DEV_SP_PSP
> depends on !(I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y && CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD=m)
Yes, thanks I'll change that for next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists