[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230216135737.GC5200@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:57:38 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
avagin@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org, luto@...nel.org,
krisman@...labora.com, tglx@...utronix.de, corbet@....net,
shuah@...nel.org, Gregory Price <gregory.price@...verge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ptrace,syscall_user_dispatch: checkpoint/restore
support for SUD
On 02/14, Gregory Price wrote:
>
> +struct compat_ptrace_sud_config {
> + compat_ulong_t mode;
> + compat_uptr_t selector;
> + compat_ulong_t offset;
> + compat_ulong_t len;
> +};
...
> +int syscall_user_dispatch_get_config(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long size,
> + void __user *data)
> +{
> + struct syscall_user_dispatch *sd = &task->syscall_dispatch;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> + if (unlikely(in_compat_syscall())) {
> + struct compat_ptrace_sud_config cfg32;
> +
> + if (size != sizeof(struct compat_ptrace_sud_config))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
Horror ;) why?
See my reply to v9, just make
struct ptrace_sud_config {
__u8 mode;
__u64 selector;
__u64 offset;
__u64 len;
};
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists