[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <f93fdb4e-05e0-4301-95c9-3e1b1200d9b2@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:51:50 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Baoquan He" <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Kefeng Wang" <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
"Niklas Schnelle" <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
"David Laight" <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
"Stafford Horne" <shorne@...il.com>,
"Brian Cain" <bcain@...cinc.com>, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/16] hexagon: mm: Convert to GENERIC_IOREMAP
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023, at 15:47, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 02/16/23 at 01:53pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023, at 13:34, Baoquan He wrote:
>> I see that there are only two callers of {devm_,}ioremap_uc() left in the
>> tree, so maybe we can even take that final step and remove it from
>> the interface. Maybe we can revisit [1] as part of this series.
>
> I see now. Christoph Hellwig ever mentioned in v2 reviewing, I
> didn't get why. Thanks for the details.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/YwHX98KBEnZw9t6e@infradead.org/T/#u
>
> I am not sure if it's OK to do the change in this patchset, maybe
> another patch?
Yes, a separate patch would be ideal. If you do the same change in
more than one architecture (other than ia64 and x86), you can combine
those into one patch.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists