lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 09:53:14 -0500
From:   Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@....com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Huang, Shimmer" <Shimmer.Huang@....com>,
        "Liu, Aaron" <Aaron.Liu@....com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        "regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
        "Hegde, Vasant" <Vasant.Hegde@....com>,
        amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Matt Fagnani <matt.fagnani@...l.net>,
        "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [regression, bisected, pci/iommu] Bug 216865 - Black screen when amdgpu started during 6.2-rc1 boot with AMD IOMMU enabled

[+Suravee]

Am 2023-02-15 um 19:44 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:35:45PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> If I understand this correctly, the HW or the BIOS is doing something wrong
>> about reporting ACS. I don't know what the GPU driver can do other than add
>> some quirk to stop using AMD IOMMUv2 on this HW/BIOS.
> How about this:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu_v2.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu_v2.c
> index 864e4ffb6aa94e..cc027ce9a6e86f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu_v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu_v2.c
> @@ -732,6 +732,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(amd_iommu_unbind_pasid);
>   
>   int amd_iommu_init_device(struct pci_dev *pdev, int pasids)
>   {
> +	struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data = dev_iommu_priv_get(&pdev->dev);
>   	struct device_state *dev_state;
>   	struct iommu_group *group;
>   	unsigned long flags;
> @@ -740,6 +741,9 @@ int amd_iommu_init_device(struct pci_dev *pdev, int pasids)
>   
>   	might_sleep();
>   
> +	if (!dev_data->ats.enabled)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * When memory encryption is active the device is likely not in a
>   	 * direct-mapped domain. Forbid using IOMMUv2 functionality for now.

Hi Suravee,

What to you think about this proposed change?

Regards,
   Felix

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ