[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+5IByR9RelBDm2+@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:13:11 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>, will@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
ecurtin@...hat.com, lina@...hilina.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
ravi.bangoria@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm_pmu: fix event CPU filtering
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 03:35:19PM +0100, Janne Grunau wrote:
> On 2023-02-16 14:12:38 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Fix the CPU filtering by performing this consistently in
> > armpmu_filter(), and remove the redundant arm_pmu::filter() callback and
> > armv8pmu_filter() implementation.
> >
> > Commit bd2756811766 also silently removed the CHAIN event filtering from
> > armv8pmu_filter(), which will be addressed by a separate patch without
> > using the filter callback.
[...]
> This works as well. I limited the patch to the minimal fix this
> this late in the cycle.
I did appreciate that you'd made the effort for the minimal fix; had the issue
with CHAIN events not existed I would have acked that as-is and done the
simplification later. Given the CHAIN issue and given the simplification make
the code "obviously correct" I think it's preferable to do both bits now.
> Tested-by: Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>
Thanks!
Hopefully Will or Peter can pick this up shortly; I'm assuming that Will can
take this via the arm64 tree.
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists