linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: display/msm: dsi-controller-main: Fix deprecated QCM2290 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d4ffa9f0-797e-7a32-147e-64aa46d7e197@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2023 21:13:59 +0000
From:   Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
        agross@...nel.org
Cc:     marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Krishna Manikandan <quic_mkrishn@...cinc.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: display/msm: dsi-controller-main: Fix
 deprecated QCM2290 compatible

On 17/02/2023 12:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> First, it would be nice to know what was the intention of Bryan's commit?

Sorry I've been grazing this thread but, not responding.

- qcom,dsi-ctrl-6g-qcm2290

is non-compliant with qcom,socid-dsi-ctrl which is our desired naming 
convention, so that's what the deprecation is about i.e. moving this 
compat to "qcom,qcm2290-dsi-ctrl"

Actually I have the question why we are deciding to go with "sm6115" 
instead of "qcm2290" ?

The stamp on the package you receive from Thundercomm says "qcm2290" not 
"sm6115"

?

---
bod