[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/AJUi4o5hOKDkgy@x1n>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 18:10:10 -0500
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/uffd: UFFD_FEATURE_WP_ZEROPAGE
Hi, Muhammad,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 05:31:19PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> I've just ran my single threaded selftest [1] over an over again to get
> some numbers.
>
> Without zeropage
> qemu has 6 cores: 26.0355
Did you count in the time of read prefault? Or did you not prefault at
all?
> With zeropage
> qemu has 6 cores: 39.203
>
> 33% worse performance with zero pages
>
> Definitely, there can be better benchmark application. Please let me know
> if I should write better benchmarks on my end.
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230202112915.867409-7-usama.anjum@collabora.com
I'll have a closer look too next week.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists