linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/hyperv: Pass on the lpj value from host to guest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230216194101.GA685@skinsburskii.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 11:41:01 -0800
From:   Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@...ux.microsoft.com>
To:     "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     Stanislav Kinsburskiy <stanislav.kinsburskiy@...il.com>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/hyperv: Pass on the lpj value from host to guest

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 04:19:13PM +0000, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
> From: Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@...ux.microsoft.com>
> > 
> > And have it preset.
> > This change allows to significantly reduce time to bring up guest SMP
> > configuration as well as make sure the guest won't get inaccurate
> > calibration results due to "noisy neighbour" situation.
> > 
> > Below are the numbers for 16 VCPU guest before the patch (~1300 msec)
> > 
> > [    0.562938] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
> > ...
> > [    1.859447] smp: Brought up 1 node, 16 CPUs
> > 
> > and after the patch (~130 msec):
> > 
> > [    0.445079] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
> > ...
> > [    0.575035] smp: Brought up 1 node, 16 CPUs
> > 
> > This change is inspired by commit 0293615f3fb9 ("x86: KVM guest: use
> > paravirt function to calculate cpu khz").
> 
> This patch has been nagging at me a bit, and I finally did some further
> checking.   Looking at Linux guests on local Hyper-V and in Azure, I see
> a dmesg output line like this during boot:
> 
> Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 5187.81 BogoMIPS (lpj=2593905)
> 
> We're already skipping the delay loop calculation because lpj_fine
> is set in tsc_init(), using the results of get_loops_per_jiffy().  The
> latter does exactly the same calculation as hv_preset_lpj() in
> this patch.
> 
> Is this patch arising from an environment where tsc_init() is
> skipped for some reason?  Just trying to make sure we fully
> when this patch is applicable, and when not.
> 

The problem here is a bit different: "lpj_fine" is considered only for
the boot CPU (from init/calibrate.c):

        } else if ((!printed) && lpj_fine) {
                lpj = lpj_fine;
                pr_info("Calibrating delay loop (skipped), "
                        "value calculated using timer frequency.. ");

while all the secondary ones use the timer to calibrate.

With this change lpj_preset will be used for all cores (from
init/calbrate.c):

        } else if (preset_lpj) {
                lpj = preset_lpj;
                if (!printed)
                        pr_info("Calibrating delay loop (skipped) "
                                "preset value.. ");

This lofic with lpj_fine comes from commit 3da757daf86e ("x86: use
cpu_khz for loops_per_jiffy calculation"), where the commit messages
states the following:

    We do this only for the boot processor because the AP's can have
    different base frequencies or the BIOS might boot a AP at a different
    frequency.

Hope this helps.

Thanks,
Stanislav

> Michael
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsburskiy <stanislav.kinsburskiy@...il.com>
> > CC: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
> > CC: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> > CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
> > CC: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> > CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> > CC: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> > CC: x86@...nel.org
> > CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> > CC: linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org
> > CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > index dedec2f23ad1..0282b2e96cc2 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > @@ -320,6 +320,21 @@ static void __init hv_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int
> > max_cpus)
> >  }
> >  #endif
> > 
> > +static void __init __maybe_unused hv_preset_lpj(void)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long khz;
> > +	u64 lpj;
> > +
> > +	if (!x86_platform.calibrate_tsc)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	khz = x86_platform.calibrate_tsc();
> > +
> > +	lpj = ((u64)khz * 1000);
> > +	do_div(lpj, HZ);
> > +	preset_lpj = lpj;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
> >  {
> >  	int hv_max_functions_eax;
> > @@ -521,6 +536,12 @@ static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
> > 
> >  	/* Register Hyper-V specific clocksource */
> >  	hv_init_clocksource();
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Preset lpj to make calibrate_delay a no-op, which is turn helps to
> > +	 * speed up secondary cores initialization.
> > +	 */
> > +	hv_preset_lpj();
> >  #endif
> >  	/*
> >  	 * TSC should be marked as unstable only after Hyper-V
> > 
>