linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: at91: dt: adding new macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <994c3edd-040c-5050-9c99-1e8326459d54@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:47:20 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com, ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: at91: dt: adding new macros

On 16/02/2023 23:25, Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com wrote:
> From: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com>
> 
> Adding macros for sama7g drive strength.

Use subject prefixes matching the subsystem (which you can get for
example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
your patch is touching).

Nothing improved here.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com>
> ---
> changes from v1:
> - Fix ABI break.
> - Add some small comments to describe drive strength macros.
> 
>  include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/at91.h | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/at91.h b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/at91.h
> index e8e117306b1b..12f3edf2a9c4 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/at91.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/at91.h
> @@ -42,8 +42,16 @@
>  #define AT91_PERIPH_C		3
>  #define AT91_PERIPH_D		4
>  
> -#define ATMEL_PIO_DRVSTR_LO	1
> +/*These macros are for all other at91 pinctrl drivers*/
> +#define ATMEL_PIO_DRVSTR_LO	0
> +#define ATMEL_PIO_DRVSTR_LO_1	1
>  #define ATMEL_PIO_DRVSTR_ME	2
>  #define ATMEL_PIO_DRVSTR_HI	3
>  
> +/* These macros are for the sama7g5 pinctrl driver*/

What I mean, is the explanation of the constants. What is LO_D?

> +#define ATMEL_PIO_DRVSTR_LO_D 0

Also looks like wrong indentation between define and value.

> +#define ATMEL_PIO_DRVSTR_HI_A 1
> +#define ATMEL_PIO_DRVSTR_LO_C 2
> +#define ATMEL_PIO_DRVSTR_LO_B 3
> +
>  #endif /* __DT_BINDINGS_AT91_PINCTRL_H__ */

Best regards,
Krzysztof