linux-kernel - [PATCH v5] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: add module parameter to ignore ready flag from remote processor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230217094124.9440-1-iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2023 11:41:24 +0200
From:   "Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" <iuliana.prodan@....nxp.com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "S.J. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
Cc:     linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v5] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: add module parameter to ignore ready flag from remote processor

From: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>

There are cases when we want to test a simple "hello world"
application on the DSP and we don't have IPC between the cores.
Therefore, do not wait for a confirmation from the remote processor
at start.

Added "no_mailboxes" flag while inserting the module to not initialize
any mailboxes, and so ignore remote processor reply after start.
By default, this is off - do not ignore reply from rproc.

Signed-off-by: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
---
Changes since v4
- s/ignore_dsp_ready/no_mailboxes
- make imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_init() a function pointer which,
based on the no_mailboxes module parameter, can initialize
the mailboxes (= imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_alloc()), in case they exists,
otherwise does nothing (= imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_no_alloc()).

Changes since v3
- do not instantiate static var to 0, this is done by default
- do not initialize mailbox if not IPC between the core

Changes since v2
- s/ignoreready/ignore_dsp_ready

Changes since v1
- change BIT(31) to BIT(1) for REMOTE_SKIP_WAIT
---
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
index 95da1cbefacf..85eea85b1655 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
@@ -28,6 +28,15 @@
 
 #define DSP_RPROC_CLK_MAX			5
 
+/*
+ * Module parameters
+ */
+static unsigned int no_mailboxes;
+module_param_named(no_mailboxes, no_mailboxes, int, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_mailboxes,
+		 "There is no mailbox between cores, so ignore remote proc "
+		 "reply after start, default is 0 (off).");
+
 #define REMOTE_IS_READY				BIT(0)
 #define REMOTE_READY_WAIT_MAX_RETRIES		500
 
@@ -172,6 +181,9 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_dsp_rproc_att_imx8ulp[] = {
 	{ 0x30000000, 0x90000000, 0x10000000, 0},
 };
 
+/* Initialize the mailboxes between cores, if exists */
+static int (*imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_init)(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv);
+
 /* Reset function for DSP on i.MX8MP */
 static int imx8mp_dsp_reset(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
 {
@@ -492,12 +504,12 @@ static void imx_dsp_rproc_rxdb_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *data)
 }
 
 /**
- * imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_init() - request mailbox channels
+ * imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_alloc() - request mailbox channels
  * @priv: private data pointer
  *
  * Request three mailbox channels (tx, rx, rxdb).
  */
-static int imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_init(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
+static int imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_alloc(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
 {
 	struct device *dev = priv->rproc->dev.parent;
 	struct mbox_client *cl;
@@ -560,6 +572,18 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_init(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/**
+ * imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_no_alloc()
+ *
+ * Empty function for no mailbox between cores
+ *
+ * Always return 0
+ */
+static int imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_no_alloc(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void imx_dsp_rproc_free_mbox(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
 {
 	mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
@@ -903,6 +927,11 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	priv->rproc = rproc;
 	priv->dsp_dcfg = dsp_dcfg;
 
+	if (no_mailboxes)
+		imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_init = imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_no_alloc;
+	else
+		imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_init = imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_alloc;
+
 	dev_set_drvdata(dev, rproc);
 
 	INIT_WORK(&priv->rproc_work, imx_dsp_rproc_vq_work);
-- 
2.17.1