linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ext4: commit super block if fs record error when journal record without error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2023 11:56:47 +0100
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     "yebin (H)" <yebin10@...wei.com>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ye Bin <yebin@...weicloud.com>,
        tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ext4: commit super block if fs record error when
 journal record without error

On Fri 17-02-23 09:44:57, yebin (H) wrote:
> On 2023/2/17 1:31, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Tue 14-02-23 10:29:04, Ye Bin wrote:
> > > From: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
> > > 
> > > Now, 'es->s_state' maybe covered by recover journal. And journal errno
> > > maybe not recorded in journal sb as IO error. ext4_update_super() only
> > > update error information when 'sbi->s_add_error_count' large than zero.
> > > Then 'EXT4_ERROR_FS' flag maybe lost.
> > > To solve above issue commit error information after recover journal.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
> > > ---
> > >   fs/ext4/super.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > > index dc3907dff13a..b94754ba8556 100644
> > > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> > > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > > @@ -5932,6 +5932,18 @@ static int ext4_load_journal(struct super_block *sb,
> > >   		goto err_out;
> > >   	}
> > > +	if (unlikely(es->s_error_count && !jbd2_journal_errno(journal) &&
> > > +		     !(le16_to_cpu(es->s_state) & EXT4_ERROR_FS))) {
> > > +		EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_state |= EXT4_ERROR_FS;
> > > +		es->s_state |= cpu_to_le16(EXT4_ERROR_FS);
> > > +		err = ext4_commit_super(sb);
> > > +		if (err) {
> > > +			ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
> > > +				 "Failed to commit error information, please repair fs force!");
> > > +			goto err_out;
> > > +		}
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > Hum, I'm not sure I follow here. If journal replay has overwritten the
> > superblock (and thus the stored error info), then I'd expect
> > es->s_error_count got overwritten (possibly to 0) as well. And this is
> > actually relatively realistic scenario with errors=remount-ro behavior when
> > the first fs error happens.
> > 
> > What I intended in my original suggestion was to save es->s_error_count,
> > es->s_state & EXT4_ERROR_FS, es->s_first_error_*, es->s_last_error_* before
> > doing journal replay in ext4_load_journal() and then after journal replay
> > merge this info back to the superblock
> Actually，commit 1c13d5c08728 ("ext4: Save error information to the
> superblock for analysis")
> already merged error info back to the superblock after journal replay except
> 'es->s_state'.
> The problem I have now is that the error flag in the journal superblock was
> not recorded,
> but the error message was recorded in the superblock. So it leads to
> ext4_clear_journal_err()
> does not detect errors and marks the file system as an error. Because
> ext4_update_super() is
> only set error flag  when 'sbi->s_add_error_count  > 0'. Although
> 'sbi->s_mount_state' is
> written to the super block when umount, but it is also conditional.
> So I handle the scenario "es->s_error_count && !jbd2_journal_errno(journal)
> &&
> !(le16_to_cpu(es->s_state) & EXT4_ERROR_FS)". Maybe we can just store
> 'EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_state & EXT4_ERROR_FS' back to the superblock. But i
> prefer to mark fs as error if it contain detail error info without
> EXT4_ERROR_FS.

Aha, thanks for explanation! So now I finally understand what the problem
exactly is. I'm not sure relying on es->s_error_count is too good. Probably
it works but I'd be calmer if when saving error info we also did:

	bool error_fs = es->s_state & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_ERROR_FS);

	copy other info
	err = jbd2_journal_load(journal);
	restore other info
	if (error_fs)
		es->s_state |= cpu_to_le16(EXT4_ERROR_FS);
	/* Write out restored error information to the superblock */
	err2 = ext4_commit_super(sb);

and be done with this. I don't think trying to optimize away the committing
of the superblock when we had to replay the journal is really worth it.

Does this solve your concerns?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR