[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+9hmmAlHOo4yX9Q@debian>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 12:14:34 +0100
From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
To: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>
Cc: jchapman@...alix.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] l2tp: Avoid possible recursive deadlock in
l2tp_tunnel_register()
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 01:37:10AM +0900, Shigeru Yoshida wrote:
> @@ -840,8 +850,7 @@ static int pppol2tp_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uservaddr,
> }
> if (drop_refcnt)
> l2tp_session_dec_refcount(session);
> - if (drop_tunnel)
> - l2tp_tunnel_dec_refcount(tunnel);
> + l2tp_tunnel_dec_refcount(tunnel);
> release_sock(sk);
>
> return error;
The l2tp_tunnel_dec_refcount() call could be done after release_sock(),
to make the code more logical (as the refcount is now taken before
lock_sock()). Anyway, that shouldn't be a problem and I don't want to
delay this fix any longer.
Reviewed-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists