lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+9sKN2QcBV2VYKC@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:59:36 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] pinctrl: at91: Utilise temporary variable for
 struct device

On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:54:02AM +0000, Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com wrote:
> On 15.02.2023 15:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > @@ -1758,7 +1750,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_of_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >         if (!gpiochip_prev) {
> >                 girq->parent_handler = gpio_irq_handler;
> >                 girq->num_parents = 1;
> > -               girq->parents = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, 1,
> > +               girq->parents = devm_kcalloc(dev, girq->num_parents,
> 
> There is still the change of the 2nd argument of devm_kcalloc() from 1 ->
> girq->num_parents (no functional change, though) which doesn't match the
> purpose of the patch and is not specified anywhere. Other than this:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
> 
> >                                              sizeof(*girq->parents),
> >                                              GFP_KERNEL);

Thanks for review. I have no time to fix this. So if Linus is okay to take
the first 4 patches, I'm fine. You or somebody else can submit an updated
5th patch later on.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ