[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+9sKN2QcBV2VYKC@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:59:36 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] pinctrl: at91: Utilise temporary variable for
struct device
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:54:02AM +0000, Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com wrote:
> On 15.02.2023 15:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > @@ -1758,7 +1750,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_of_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > if (!gpiochip_prev) {
> > girq->parent_handler = gpio_irq_handler;
> > girq->num_parents = 1;
> > - girq->parents = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, 1,
> > + girq->parents = devm_kcalloc(dev, girq->num_parents,
>
> There is still the change of the 2nd argument of devm_kcalloc() from 1 ->
> girq->num_parents (no functional change, though) which doesn't match the
> purpose of the patch and is not specified anywhere. Other than this:
>
> Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
>
> > sizeof(*girq->parents),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
Thanks for review. I have no time to fix this. So if Linus is okay to take
the first 4 patches, I'm fine. You or somebody else can submit an updated
5th patch later on.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists