[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230217144143.wikkdw44jkdcgdm2@quack3>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:41:43 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Li zeming <zeming@...china.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs-writeback: remove unnecessary ‘false’ values from wakeup_bdi
On Wed 08-02-23 09:17:42, Li zeming wrote:
> wakeup_bdi does not need to be initialized. It is used after being
> assigned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li zeming <zeming@...china.com>
Looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 6fba5a52127b..2d3191d9c736 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -2486,7 +2486,7 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
> */
> if (!was_dirty) {
> struct list_head *dirty_list;
> - bool wakeup_bdi = false;
> + bool wakeup_bdi;
>
> inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
> if (dirtytime)
> --
> 2.18.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists