[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+/DQ6l0pDcxC2c3@ubun2204.myguest.virtualbox.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 23:41:15 +0530
From: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>, cocci@...ia.fr,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...rosoft.com>,
Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
Subject: [PATCH] coccinelle: put_device: Include of_node_put to avoid false
positives
The node reference increased by of_find_device_by_node() can also be
released by using a call to of_node_put(). Hence when this exists, the
script should not trigger a warning, which otherwise will be a false
positive.
Also, improve the warning message to include of_node_put too is missing.
Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
---
scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci
index f09f1e79bfa6..259195b501aa 100644
--- a/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci
+++ b/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci
@@ -18,8 +18,10 @@ type T,T1,T2,T3;
id = of_find_device_by_node@p1(x)
... when != e = id
+ when != of_node_put(x)
if (id == NULL || ...) { ... return ...; }
... when != put_device(&id->dev)
+ when != of_node_put(x)
when != platform_device_put(id)
when != if (id) { ... put_device(&id->dev) ... }
when != e1 = (T)id
@@ -42,7 +44,7 @@ p2 << search.p2;
@@
coccilib.report.print_report(p2[0],
- "ERROR: missing put_device; call of_find_device_by_node on line "
+ "ERROR: missing put_device or of_node_put; call of_find_device_by_node on line "
+ p1[0].line
+ ", but without a corresponding object release within this function.")
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists