[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230218032117.2372071-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 22:21:15 -0500
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>, mingo@...hat.com,
stern@...land.harvard.edu
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] lockdep lock comparison function
This patch implements the lock comparison function I've been talking
about, and converts one of bcache's locks to use it.
b->write_lock has different locking rules; I'm not sure there's an easy
way to get rid of lockdep_set_novalidate_class for it - but the code has
changed and my memory is foggy.
I'd like it if we could convert existing uses of *_lock_nested() to this
approach, since it's more rigorous and IMO, much clearer. That'll
require looking at specific use cases, though - the inode lock in
fs/inode.c is the only one I looked at and it's got a lot of nutty stuff
going on.
Kent Overstreet (2):
lockdep: lock_set_lock_cmp_fn()
bcache: Convert to lock_cmp_fn
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 15 ++++++++++-
drivers/md/bcache/btree.h | 4 +--
include/linux/lockdep.h | 8 ++++++
include/linux/lockdep_types.h | 6 +++++
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
5 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists