[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfdf75cc-96bb-d139-c190-51f5a93be27f@loongson.cn>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 14:31:45 +0800
From: Qing Zhang <zhangqing@...ngson.cn>
To: WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] LoongArch: Add ptrace single step support
Hi, Xuerui
On 2023/2/17 下午6:16, WANG Xuerui wrote:
> On 2023/2/17 10:37, Qing Zhang wrote:
>> Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT,
>> PTRACE_KILL and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. This implies defining
>> arch_has_single_step in and implementing the
>> user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions.
>>
>> LongArch has no hardware single-step register. the hardware single-step
>
> "LoongArch cannot do hardware single-stepping per se" could be more
> accurate a description. ("Hardware single-step register" could be
> ambiguous in implying the only way to achieve single-stepping would be
> via software, but in fact you explained in the next sentence that it's
> actually doable, just in an alternate way.)
>
>> function multiplex fetch instruction watchpoint(FWPS) and specifies that
>> the next instruction must trigger the watch exception by setting the
>> mask bit.
>
> I assume the "multiplex" is translated from "复用", in which case it's
> not used in the exact same way as in Chinese. Plus you have the subject
> wrong, "hardware single-step function" is the topic but not the actor
> doing the "multiplexing".
>
> My take (continuing from the previous sentence I suggested):
>
> "Instead it is achieved by configuring the instruction fetch watchpoints
> so that WPEF is triggered on the next instruction."
>
>> Some scenarios use CSR.FWPS.Skip to ignore the next hit result, not to
>> trigger
>> the watchpoint exception, and proceed to the next instruction.
>
> Again, wrong topicalization ("scenarios" is not the actor/subject). "In
> some scenarios CSR.FWPS.Skip is used to ..." sounds better.
>
> And the multiple "next" usages sound unclear, you could probably reword
> this a bit. (I can't immediately understand this part so I'm unable to
> provide a suggestion.)
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qing Zhang <zhangqing@...ngson.cn>
>> ---
>> arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h | 39 +++++++++++++++
>> arch/loongarch/include/asm/loongarch.h | 3 ++
>> arch/loongarch/include/asm/processor.h | 3 ++
>> arch/loongarch/include/asm/ptrace.h | 2 +
>> arch/loongarch/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 35 +++++++++++--
>> arch/loongarch/kernel/ptrace.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c | 34 +++++++++++--
>> 7 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
>> b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
>> index ba18ce8fbdf2..00c6f261d9a2 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
>> @@ -368,6 +368,45 @@ static inline bool is_stack_alloc_ins(union
>> loongarch_instruction *ip)
>> is_imm12_negative(ip->reg2i12_format.immediate);
>> }
>> +static inline bool branch_ins_target_pc(union loongarch_instruction *ip)
>
> This name is not faithfully reflecting its purpose, which is to check if
> the given instruction will change PC; and the reason this has to be done
> in the first place being that, single stepping would never stop due to
> current hardware erratum if the PC would stay the same after the insn's
> execution.
>
> You may want to add some comments regarding the erratum too if you're in
> a position to disclose more details.
> >> +{
>> + switch (ip->reg0i26_format.opcode) {
>> + case b_op:
>> + case bl_op:
>> + if (ip->reg0i26_format.immediate_l == 0
>> + && ip->reg0i26_format.immediate_h == 0)
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + switch (ip->reg1i21_format.opcode) {
>> + case beqz_op:
>> + case bnez_op:
>> + case bceqz_op:
>> + if (ip->reg1i21_format.immediate_l == 0
>> + && ip->reg1i21_format.immediate_h == 0)
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + switch (ip->reg2i16_format.opcode) {
>> + case jirl_op:
>> + if (ip->reg2i16_format.rj == 0x1
>> + && ip->reg2i16_format.rd == 0x1
> Given the appearance of the other cases, I feel like the triggering
> condition of the nonterminating singlestepping is that "new PC ==
> current PC" always hold. So, isn't every `rd == rj && imm == 0` case
> problematic?
>
We just have to think about dest_pc == current_pc,
Not every case where 'rd == rj &&imm == 0' is a problem.
current_pc = csr_era (The user mode of the Exception pc)
dest_pc = rj + offset
eg:
jirl ra,ra 0
1. When rj == ra, current_pc = dest_pc.
jirl t0,t0 0
2. When rj is another register, if the value in it is equal to ra,
current_pc = dest_pc. The value of rj is recovered by pt_reg.
Therefore, rd does not need comparison, I modified jirl's judgment and
others in v5.
Thanks,
-Qing
>> + && ip->reg2i16_format.immediate == 0)
>> + return false;
>> + break;
>> + case beq_op:
>> + case bne_op:
>> + case blt_op:
>> + case bge_op:
>> + case bltu_op:
>> + case bgeu_op:
>> + if (ip->reg2i16_format.immediate == 0)
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> void simu_pc(struct pt_regs *regs, union loongarch_instruction insn);
>> void simu_branch(struct pt_regs *regs, union loongarch_instruction
>> insn);
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/loongarch.h
>> b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/loongarch.h
>> index e9aed583a064..65b7dcdea16d 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/loongarch.h
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/loongarch.h
>> @@ -1055,6 +1055,9 @@ static __always_inline void iocsr_write64(u64
>> val, u32 reg)
>> #define LOONGARCH_CSR_DERA 0x501 /* debug era */
>> #define LOONGARCH_CSR_DESAVE 0x502 /* debug save */
>> +#define CSR_FWPC_SKIP_SHIFT 16
>> +#define CSR_FWPC_SKIP (_ULCAST_(1) << CSR_FWPC_SKIP_SHIFT)
>> +
>> /*
>> * CSR_ECFG IM
>> */
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/processor.h
>> b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/processor.h
>> index db060c5a976f..3ea0f1910c23 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/processor.h
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/processor.h
>> @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ struct thread_struct {
>> struct perf_event *hbp_break[LOONGARCH_MAX_BRP];
>> struct perf_event *hbp_watch[LOONGARCH_MAX_WRP];
>> + /* Used by ptrace single_step */
>
> "PTRACE_SINGLESTEP" if you want to refer to the technical name of the
> feature, or "ptrace single stepping" which is more natural language.
>
>> + unsigned long single_step;
>> +
>> /*
>> * FPU & vector registers, must be at last because
>> * they are conditionally copied at fork().
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> index 58596c4f8a0f..66a0e6c480a3 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> @@ -150,4 +150,6 @@ static inline void user_stack_pointer_set(struct
>> pt_regs *regs,
>> regs->regs[3] = val;
>> }
>> +#define arch_has_single_step() (1)
>> +
>> #endif /* _ASM_PTRACE_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
>> b/arch/loongarch/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
>> index 6431cd319c32..75d3652fbe00 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
>> @@ -153,6 +153,22 @@ static int hw_breakpoint_slot_setup(struct
>> perf_event **slots, int max_slots,
>> */
>> void flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(struct task_struct *tsk)
>> {
>> + int i;
>> + struct thread_struct *t = &tsk->thread;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < LOONGARCH_MAX_BRP; i++) {
>> + if (t->hbp_break[i]) {
>> + unregister_hw_breakpoint(t->hbp_break[i]);
>> + t->hbp_break[i] = NULL;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < LOONGARCH_MAX_WRP; i++) {
>> + if (t->hbp_watch[i]) {
>> + unregister_hw_breakpoint(t->hbp_watch[i]);
>> + t->hbp_watch[i] = NULL;
>> + }
>> + }
>> }
>> void ptrace_hw_copy_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
>> @@ -498,11 +514,20 @@ arch_initcall(arch_hw_breakpoint_init);
>> void hw_breakpoint_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
>> {
>> struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(next);
>> -
>> - /* Update breakpoints */
>> - update_bp_registers(regs, 1, 0);
>> - /* Update watchpoints */
>> - update_bp_registers(regs, 1, 1);
>> + u64 addr, mask;
>> +
>> + if (test_bit(TIF_SINGLESTEP, &task_thread_info(next)->flags)) {
>> + addr = read_wb_reg(CSR_CFG_ADDR, 0, 0);
>> + mask = read_wb_reg(CSR_CFG_MASK, 0, 0);
>> + if ((task_pt_regs(next)->csr_era & ~mask) == (addr & ~mask))
>> + csr_write32(CSR_FWPC_SKIP, LOONGARCH_CSR_FWPS);
>> + regs->csr_prmd |= CSR_PRMD_PWE;
>> + } else {
>> + /* Update breakpoints */
>> + update_bp_registers(regs, 1, 0);
>> + /* Update watchpoints */
>> + update_bp_registers(regs, 1, 1);
>> + }
>> }
>> void hw_breakpoint_pmu_read(struct perf_event *bp)
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/ptrace.c
>> b/arch/loongarch/kernel/ptrace.c
>> index bee4194177fd..52a3ee4366f4 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/ptrace.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/ptrace.c
>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>> #include <linux/context_tracking.h>
>> #include <linux/elf.h>
>> #include <linux/errno.h>
>> +#include <linux/hw_breakpoint.h>
>> #include <linux/mm.h>
>> #include <linux/ptrace.h>
>> #include <linux/regset.h>
>> @@ -30,6 +31,7 @@
>> #include <linux/stddef.h>
>> #include <linux/seccomp.h>
>> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>> +#include <linux/thread_info.h>
>> #include <asm/byteorder.h>
>> #include <asm/cpu.h>
>> @@ -39,6 +41,7 @@
>> #include <asm/page.h>
>> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>> #include <asm/processor.h>
>> +#include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> #include <asm/reg.h>
>> #include <asm/syscall.h>
>> @@ -541,3 +544,68 @@ long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long
>> request,
>> return ret;
>> }
>> +
>> +void ptrace_triggered(struct perf_event *bp,
>> + struct perf_sample_data *data, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> + struct perf_event_attr attr;
>> +
>> + attr = bp->attr;
>> + attr.disabled = true;
>> + modify_user_hw_breakpoint(bp, &attr);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int set_single_step(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr)
>> +{
>> + struct thread_struct *thread = &tsk->thread;
>> + struct perf_event *bp;
>> + struct perf_event_attr attr;
>> + struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info;
>> +
>> + bp = thread->hbp_break[0];
>> + if (!bp) {
>> + ptrace_breakpoint_init(&attr);
>> +
>> + attr.bp_addr = addr;
>> + attr.bp_len = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8;
>> + attr.bp_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_X;
>> +
>> + bp = register_user_hw_breakpoint(&attr, ptrace_triggered,
>> + NULL, tsk);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bp))
>> + return PTR_ERR(bp);
>> +
>> + thread->hbp_break[0] = bp;
>> + } else {
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + attr = bp->attr;
>> + attr.bp_addr = addr;
>> + /* reenable breakpoint */
>> + attr.disabled = false;
>> + err = modify_user_hw_breakpoint(bp, &attr);
>> + if (unlikely(err))
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + csr_write64(attr.bp_addr, LOONGARCH_CSR_IB0ADDR);
>> + }
>> + info = counter_arch_bp(bp);
>> + info->mask = 0xffffffffffff;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* ptrace API */
>> +void user_enable_single_step(struct task_struct *task)
>> +{
>> + struct thread_info *ti = task_thread_info(task);
>> +
>> + set_single_step(task, task_pt_regs(task)->csr_era);
>> + task->thread.single_step = task_pt_regs(task)->csr_era;
>> + set_ti_thread_flag(ti, TIF_SINGLESTEP);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void user_disable_single_step(struct task_struct *task)
>> +{
>> + clear_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SINGLESTEP);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c
>> b/arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c
>> index 2b133079e0f3..a59275a43bd1 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c
>> @@ -511,9 +511,37 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr do_watch(struct pt_regs
>> *regs)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
>> irqentry_state_t state = irqentry_enter(regs);
>> - breakpoint_handler(regs);
>> - watchpoint_handler(regs);
>> - force_sig(SIGTRAP);
>> + if (test_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_SINGLESTEP)) {
>> + int llbit = (csr_read32(LOONGARCH_CSR_LLBCTL) & 0x1);
>> + unsigned long pc = regs->csr_era;
>> + union loongarch_instruction *ip = (union
>> loongarch_instruction *)pc;
>> +
>> + if (llbit) {
>> + /*
>> + * When the ll-sc combo is encountered, it is regarded as an
>> single
>> + * instruction. So don't clear llbit and reset CSR.FWPS.Skip
>> until
>> + * the llsc execution is completed.
>> + */
>> + csr_write32(CSR_FWPC_SKIP, LOONGARCH_CSR_FWPS);
>> + csr_write32(CSR_LLBCTL_KLO, LOONGARCH_CSR_LLBCTL);
>> + } else if (pc == current->thread.single_step) {
>> + /*
>> + * Maybe some hardware Bug caused that certain insns are
>> occasionally
>> + * not skipped when CSR.FWPS.Skip is set, such as
>> fld.d/fst.d. So Singlestep
>> + * needs to compare whether the csr_era is equal to the value
>> of singlestep
>> + * which last time set.
>> + */
>> + if (branch_ins_target_pc(ip))
>> + /* Prevent rd == pc from causing single step to fail to
>> stop */
>> + csr_write32(CSR_FWPC_SKIP, LOONGARCH_CSR_FWPS);
>> + } else {
>> + force_sig(SIGTRAP);
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + breakpoint_handler(regs);
>> + watchpoint_handler(regs);
>> + force_sig(SIGTRAP);
>> + }
>> irqentry_exit(regs, state);
>> #endif
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists