linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/1] drm/panel: st7703: Fix vertical refresh rate of XBD599

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230219114553.288057-1-frank@oltmanns.dev>
Date:   Sun, 19 Feb 2023 12:45:52 +0100
From:   Frank Oltmanns <frank@...manns.dev>
To:     Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>,
        Purism Kernel Team <kernel@...i.sm>,
        Ondrej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org (open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS),
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Cc:     Frank Oltmanns <frank@...manns.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] drm/panel: st7703: Fix vertical refresh rate of XBD599

Currently, the XBD599 panel has a pixel clock rate that results in a
vertical refresh rate of ~55.3 Hz. This causes a slight visual
stuttering, for example on the PinePhone.

To address this, I adjusted the pixel clock rate to 74844 kHz. Instead
of using this hard coded value, I inserted the formula. This approach is
already in use by:
panel-jdi-fhd-r63452.c
panel-samsung-s6e88a0-ams452ef01.c
panel-asus-z00t-tm5p5-n35596.c
panel-ebbg-ft8719.c
panel-visionox-vtdr6130.c
panel-sony-tulip-truly-nt35521.c
panel-sharp-ls060t1sx01.c
panel-samsung-sofef00.c

To have a consistent procedure within panel-sitronix-st7703.c, I also
used the formula for the JH057N panel's clock. The value for JH057N was
already correct, so this change is purely cosmetic.

I do realize that I submitted three separate patches for the ST7703
within just a few days ([1], [2]). Should I re-submit all three patches
as a single patch set? These are my first contributions to the Linux
kernel, therefore, I kindly ask for forgiveness regarding any breach of
etiquette.

Thanks,
  Frank

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230211171748.36692-1-frank@oltmanns.dev/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230213123238.76889-1-frank@oltmanns.dev/

Frank Oltmanns (1):
  drm/panel: st7703: Fix vertical refresh rate of XBD599

 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7703.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.1