[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <trinity-899c01a6-0fc5-4900-aea8-2b43802c8329-1676814734826@3c-app-gmx-bs35>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 14:52:14 +0100
From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com
Subject: Aw: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] arm: dts: mt7623: relocate gmacs,
mt7530 switch, and add port@5
> Gesendet: Samstag, 18. Februar 2023 um 20:34 Uhr
> Von: "Arınç ÜNAL" <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
> An: frank-w@...lic-files.de
> On 18.02.2023 22:11, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > Am 18. Februar 2023 18:02:11 MEZ schrieb "Arınç ÜNAL" <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>:
> >> On 18.02.2023 15:18, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> Can you also remove this from mt7530.c and do the test again? See if the
> performance changes at all.
>
> /* Set core clock into 500Mhz */
> core_write(priv, CORE_GSWPLL_GRP2,
> RG_GSWPLL_POSDIV_500M(1) |
> RG_GSWPLL_FBKDIV_500M(25));
>
with these disabled i have a bit better performance (625 Mbits/sec instead of 600) and no retransmitts on first iperf3-run.
not yet tried any rgmii-delay option (have no idea which is the right one on which position), but yes, mostly it does not improve performance...it simply does work or does not work.
regards Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists