| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <c549eaa8-02c4-4ca5-9ad9-6b713e183609@t-8ch.de> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 19:04:04 +0000 From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de> To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> Cc: Vincent Dagonneau <v@....io>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] tools/nolibc: add tests for the integer limits in stdint.h On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 07:51:33PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > From: Vincent Dagonneau <v@....io> > > This commit adds tests for the limits added in a previous commit. The > limits are defined in decimal in stdint.h and as hexadecimal in the > tests (e.g. 0x7f = 127 or 0x80 = -128). Hopefully it catches some o the > most egregious mistakes. > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Dagonneau <v@....io> > [wt: rely on the compiler-provided __SIZEOF_LONG__ to decide what values > to expect, and detect its miss to avoid reporting false errors] > Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > index 882140508d56..290249d6da30 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > @@ -561,7 +561,50 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max) > CASE_TEST(waitpid_child); EXPECT_SYSER(1, waitpid(getpid(), &tmp, WNOHANG), -1, ECHILD); break; > CASE_TEST(write_badf); EXPECT_SYSER(1, write(-1, &tmp, 1), -1, EBADF); break; > CASE_TEST(write_zero); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, write(1, &tmp, 0)); break; > - case __LINE__: > + CASE_TEST(limit_int8_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT8_MAX, (int8_t) 0x7f); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_int8_min); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT8_MIN, (int8_t) 0x80); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_uint8_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, UINT8_MAX, (uint8_t) 0xff); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_int16_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT16_MAX, (int16_t) 0x7fff); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_int16_min); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT16_MIN, (int16_t) 0x8000); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_uint16_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, UINT16_MAX, (uint16_t) 0xffff); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_int32_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT32_MAX, (int32_t) 0x7fffffff); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_int32_min); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT32_MIN, (int32_t) 0x80000000); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_uint32_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, UINT32_MAX, (uint32_t) 0xffffffff); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_int64_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT64_MAX, (int64_t) 0x7fffffffffffffff); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_int64_min); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT64_MIN, (int64_t) 0x8000000000000000); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_uint64_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, UINT64_MAX, (uint64_t) 0xffffffffffffffff); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_int_least8_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT_LEAST8_MAX, (int_least8_t) 0x7f); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_int_least8_min); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT_LEAST8_MIN, (int_least8_t) 0x80); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_uint_least8_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, UINT_LEAST8_MAX, (uint_least8_t) 0xff); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_int_least16_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT_LEAST16_MAX, (int_least16_t) 0x7fff); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_int_least16_min); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT_LEAST16_MIN, (int_least16_t) 0x8000); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_uint_least16_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, UINT_LEAST16_MAX, (uint_least16_t) 0xffff); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_int_least32_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT_LEAST32_MAX, (int_least32_t) 0x7fffffff); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_int_least32_min); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT_LEAST32_MIN, (int_least32_t) 0x80000000); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_uint_least32_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, UINT_LEAST32_MAX, (uint_least32_t) 0xffffffffU); break; > +#if __SIZEOF_LONG__ == 8 > + CASE_TEST(limit_int_least64_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT_LEAST64_MAX, (int_least64_t) 0x7fffffffffffffffLL); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_int_least64_min); EXPECT_EQ(1, INT_LEAST64_MIN, (int_least64_t) 0x8000000000000000LL); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_uint_least64_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, UINT_LEAST64_MAX, (uint_least64_t) 0xffffffffffffffffULL); break; int64 types are also defined for 32bit platforms, but the tests are only ran for 64bits. Is this intentional? > + CASE_TEST(limit_intptr_min); EXPECT_EQ(1, INTPTR_MIN, (intptr_t) 0x8000000000000000LL); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_intptr_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, INTPTR_MAX, (intptr_t) 0x7fffffffffffffffLL); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_uintptr_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, UINTPTR_MAX, (uintptr_t) 0xffffffffffffffffULL); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_ptrdiff_min); EXPECT_EQ(1, PTRDIFF_MIN, (ptrdiff_t) 0x8000000000000000LL); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_ptrdiff_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, PTRDIFF_MAX, (ptrdiff_t) 0x7fffffffffffffffLL); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_size_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, SIZE_MAX, (size_t) 0xffffffffffffffffULL); break; > +#elif __SIZEOF_LONG__ == 4 > + CASE_TEST(limit_intptr_min); EXPECT_EQ(1, INTPTR_MIN, (intptr_t) 0x80000000); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_intptr_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, INTPTR_MAX, (intptr_t) 0x7fffffff); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_uintptr_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, UINTPTR_MAX, (uintptr_t) 0xffffffffU); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_ptrdiff_min); EXPECT_EQ(1, PTRDIFF_MIN, (ptrdiff_t) 0x80000000); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_ptrdiff_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, PTRDIFF_MAX, (ptrdiff_t) 0x7fffffff); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_ptrdiff_min); EXPECT_EQ(1, PTRDIFF_MIN, (ptrdiff_t) 0x80000000); break; > + CASE_TEST(limit_ptrdiff_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, PTRDIFF_MAX, (ptrdiff_t) 0x7fffffff); break; ptrdiff tests are duplicate. > + CASE_TEST(limit_size_max); EXPECT_EQ(1, SIZE_MAX, (size_t) 0xffffffffU); break; > +#else > +# warning "__SIZEOF_LONG__ is undefined" Why not #error? > +#endif /* __WORDSIZE == 64 */ #endif comment is now incorrect > + case __LINE__: The "case" should be further left, no? > return ret; /* must be last */ > /* note: do not set any defaults so as to permit holes above */ > } > -- > 2.35.3 >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists