lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Feb 2023 21:07:43 +0100
From:   Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To:     Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 18/21] RISC-V: Add ACPI initialization in setup_arch()

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:50:40PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> Initialize the ACPI core for RISC-V during boot.
> 
> ACPI tables and interpreter are initialized based on
> the information passed from the firmware and the value of
> the kernel parameter 'acpi'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c  | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c |  25 ++++++---
>  2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> index 13b26c87c136..35e7b24a30c8 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/efi.h>
>  
>  int acpi_noirq = 1;		/* skip ACPI IRQ initialization */
>  int acpi_disabled = 1;
> @@ -26,6 +27,118 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_disabled);
>  
>  static unsigned int intc_count;
>  static struct acpi_madt_rintc cpu_madt_rintc[NR_CPUS];
> +static bool param_acpi_off __initdata;
> +static bool param_acpi_on __initdata;
> +static bool param_acpi_force __initdata;
> +
> +static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
> +{
> +	if (!arg)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* "acpi=off" disables both ACPI table parsing and interpreter */
> +	if (strcmp(arg, "off") == 0)
> +		param_acpi_off = true;
> +	else if (strcmp(arg, "on") == 0) /* prefer ACPI over DT */
> +		param_acpi_on = true;
> +	else if (strcmp(arg, "force") == 0) /* force ACPI to be enabled */
> +		param_acpi_force = true;
> +	else
> +		return -EINVAL;	/* Core will print when we return error */
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("acpi", parse_acpi);
> +
> +/*
> + * acpi_fadt_sanity_check() - Check FADT presence and carry out sanity
> + *			      checks on it
> + *
> + * Return 0 on success,  <0 on failure
> + */
> +static int __init acpi_fadt_sanity_check(void)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_table_header *table;
> +	struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt;
> +	acpi_status status;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * FADT is required on riscv; retrieve it to check its presence
> +	 * and carry out revision and ACPI HW reduced compliancy tests
> +	 */
> +	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_FADT, 0, &table);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +		const char *msg = acpi_format_exception(status);
> +
> +		pr_err("Failed to get FADT table, %s\n", msg);
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	fadt = (struct acpi_table_fadt *)table;
> +
> +	if (!(fadt->flags & ACPI_FADT_HW_REDUCED)) {

Do we also need to check for ACPI version 5.0+ when checking for HW
reduced?

> +		pr_err("FADT not ACPI hardware reduced compliant\n");
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * acpi_get_table() creates FADT table mapping that
> +	 * should be released after parsing and before resuming boot
> +	 */
> +	acpi_put_table(table);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * acpi_boot_table_init() called from setup_arch(), always.
> + *	1. find RSDP and get its address, and then find XSDT
> + *	2. extract all tables and checksums them all
> + *	3. check ACPI FADT HW reduced flag
> + *
> + * We can parse ACPI boot-time tables such as MADT after
> + * this function is called.
> + *
> + * On return ACPI is enabled if either:
> + *
> + * - ACPI tables are initialized and sanity checks passed
> + * - acpi=force was passed in the command line and ACPI was not disabled
> + *   explicitly through acpi=off command line parameter
> + *
> + * ACPI is disabled on function return otherwise
> + */
> +void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Enable ACPI instead of device tree unless
> +	 * - ACPI has been disabled explicitly (acpi=off), or
> +	 * - firmware has not populated ACPI ptr in EFI system table
> +	 *   and ACPI has not been [force] enabled (acpi=on|force)
> +	 */
> +	if (param_acpi_off ||
> +	    (!param_acpi_on && !param_acpi_force &&
> +	     efi.acpi20 == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR))
> +		return;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * ACPI is disabled at this point. Enable it in order to parse
> +	 * the ACPI tables and carry out sanity checks
> +	 */
> +	enable_acpi();
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If ACPI tables are initialized and FADT sanity checks passed,
> +	 * leave ACPI enabled and carry on booting; otherwise disable ACPI
> +	 * on initialization error.
> +	 * If acpi=force was passed on the command line it forces ACPI
> +	 * to be enabled even if its initialization failed.
> +	 */
> +	if (acpi_table_init() || acpi_fadt_sanity_check()) {
> +		pr_err("Failed to init ACPI tables\n");
> +		if (!param_acpi_force)
> +			disable_acpi();
> +	}
> +}

A lot of the above code is common with arm64. It'd be nice to share that,
but maybe refactoring can be done on top of this.

>  
>  static int acpi_parse_madt_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const unsigned long end)
>  {
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 4335f08ffaf2..c2ee7f4427a1 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>   *  Nick Kossifidis <mick@....forth.gr>
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/memblock.h>
> @@ -276,14 +277,22 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>  
>  	efi_init();
>  	paging_init();
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB)
> -	unflatten_and_copy_device_tree();
> -#else
> -	if (early_init_dt_verify(__va(XIP_FIXUP(dtb_early_pa))))
> -		unflatten_device_tree();
> -	else
> -		pr_err("No DTB found in kernel mappings\n");
> -#endif
> +
> +	/* Parse the ACPI tables for possible boot-time configuration */
> +	acpi_boot_table_init();
> +	if (acpi_disabled) {
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB)) {
> +			unflatten_and_copy_device_tree();
> +		} else {
> +			if (early_init_dt_verify(__va(XIP_FIXUP(dtb_early_pa))))
> +				unflatten_device_tree();
> +			else
> +				pr_err("No DTB found in kernel mappings\n");
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		early_init_dt_verify(__va(XIP_FIXUP(dtb_early_pa)));
> +	}
> +
>  	early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
>  	misc_mem_init();
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>

Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ