linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 6.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh6-qpZ=yzseD_CQn8Gc+nGDLrufFxSFvVO2qK6+8fGUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Feb 2023 13:02:09 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Cc:     linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 6.3

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:26 AM David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com> wrote:
>
> Other:
>
> - locally enable -Wmaybe-uninitialized after fixing all warnings

I've pulled this, but I strongly suspect this change will get reverted.

I bet neither you nor linux-next is testing even _remotely_ a big
chunk of the different compiler versions that are out there, and the
reason flags like '-Wmaybe-uninitialized' get undone is because some
random compiler version on some random config and target archiecture
gives completely nonsensical warnings for odd reasons.

But hey, maybe the btrfs code is special.

              Linus