[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h6vgov2p.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 23:01:18 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Krister Johansen <kjlx@...pleofstupid.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...zon.com>,
David Reaver <me@...idreaver.com>,
Brendan Gregg <brendan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next 2/2] x86/xen/time: cleanup
xen_tsc_safe_clocksource
On Mon, Feb 20 2023 at 09:17, Krister Johansen wrote:
> @@ -495,8 +496,7 @@ static int __init xen_tsc_safe_clocksource(void)
> /* Leaf 4, sub-leaf 0 (0x40000x03) */
> cpuid_count(xen_cpuid_base() + 3, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>
> - /* tsc_mode = no_emulate (2) */
> - if (ebx != 2)
> + if (ebx != XEN_CPUID_TSC_MODE_NEVER_EMULATE)
> return 0;
>
> return 1;
What about removing more stupidity from that function?
static bool __init xen_tsc_safe_clocksource(void)
{
u32 eax, ebx. ecx, edx;
/* Leaf 4, sub-leaf 0 (0x40000x03) */
cpuid_count(xen_cpuid_base() + 3, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
return ebx == XEN_CPUID_TSC_MODE_NEVER_EMULATE;
}
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists