[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230220151211.1cdec7528db28a00320a855f@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:12:11 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the mm-nonmm-stable tree
On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:08:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
>
> bf470202dd9f ("fs: gracefully handle ->get_block not mapping bh in __mpage_writepage")
CommitDate: Thu Feb 2 22:50:07 2023 -0800
> This is commit
>
> 7010839ccfd4 ("fs: gracefully handle ->get_block not mapping bh in __mpage_writepage")
>
> in Linus' tree.
CommitDate: Thu Jan 26 16:46:35 2023 +0100
So I'm wondering why this came to light on Feb 20?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists