[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2141e513acc750bf26775f5b435f4dccd41244aa.camel@codeconstruct.com.au>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 16:28:47 +0800
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>
To: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: Add support for ASPEED i2Cv2
Hi Ryan,
> AST2600 support new register set for I2Cv2 controller, add bindings
> document to support driver of i2cv2 new register mode controller.
Some comments inline:
> + clock-frequency:
> + description:
> + Desired I2C bus clock frequency in Hz. default 100khz.
> +
> + multi-master:
> + type: boolean
> + description:
> + states that there is another master active on this bus
These are common to all i2c controllers, but I see that
i2c-controller.yaml doesn't include them (while i2c.text does).
I assume we're OK to include these in the device bindings in the
meantime. But in that case, you may also want to include the common
"smbus-alert" property, which you consume in your driver.
> + timeout:
> + type: boolean
> + description: Enable i2c bus timeout for master/slave (35ms)
> +
> + byte-mode:
> + type: boolean
> + description: Force i2c driver use byte mode transmit
> +
> + buff-mode:
> + type: boolean
> + description: Force i2c driver use buffer mode transmit
These three aren't really a property of the hardware, more of the
intended driver configuration. Do they really belong in the DT?
[and how would a DT author know which modes to choose?]
> + aspeed,gr:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> + description: The phandle of i2c global register node.
We'll probably want this to be consistent with other instances of aspeed
global register references. I've used "aspeed,global-regs" in the
proposed i3c binding:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/cover.1676532146.git.jk@codeconstruct.com.au/T/#mda2d005f77ca0c481b1f1edadb58fc1b007a5cc3
I'd argue that "global-regs" is a little more clear, but I'm okay with
either way - that change has been Acked but not been merged yet.
Whichever we choose though, it should be consistent.
Cheers,
Jeremy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists