[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/NbadiYAF5exJN0@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 12:37:13 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...rosoft.com>,
Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/amd/core: Use sysfs_emit() in show() callback
function
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:12:57PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> Using sprintf/snprintf functions are error prone and suggested to be
> replaced by scnprintf/vscnrptintf as outlined in this [1] LWN article.
>
> A more recent recommendation is to use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at()
> as per Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst in show() callback function
> when formatting values to be returned to user-space. These helper
> functions are PAGE_SIZE aware and wrap a safer call to vscnprintf().
>
> [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/69419/
>
> Issue identified using the coccinelle device_attr_show.cocci script.
This Changelog fails to inform me of what the actual problem is and why
the proposed solution is better.
As such I cannot form an opinion on the patch and must decline.
(Also, I'm not going to chase down random links on the interweb,
Changelogs should be self contained)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists