[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb576665-7983-d09a-06a6-bfde5793816e@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:23:27 +0530
From: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>,
<quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com>, <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>,
<quic_arajkuma@...cinc.com>, <quic_anusha@...cinc.com>,
<quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add RPM related nodes
Hi Konrad,
Thanks for taking time to review the patch!
On 2/17/2023 8:20 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 17.02.2023 15:20, Devi Priya wrote:
>> Add RPM Glink, RPM message RAM and SMPA1 regulator
>> nodes to support frequency scaling on IPQ9574
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in V2:
>> - Splitted the RPM and CPU Freq changes to individual patches
>> - Moved the regulators node to Board DT
>> - Dropped the regulator-always-on property
>> - Updated the compatible in regulators node with the existing
>> mp5496 compatible
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-al02-c7.dts | 11 +++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-al02-c7.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-al02-c7.dts
>> index 21b53f34ce84..8a6caaeb0c4b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-al02-c7.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-al02-c7.dts
>> @@ -57,6 +57,17 @@
>> status = "okay";
>> };
>>
>> +&rpm_requests {
>> + regulators {
>> + compatible = "qcom,rpm-mp5496-regulators";
>> +
>> + ipq9574_s1: s1 {
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <587500>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1075000>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
> This belongs in a separate patch.
>
Do you recommend to move this change to the below patch in the next spin?
[PATCH V2 6/6]arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add cpufreq support
>> +
>> &sdhc_1 {
>> pinctrl-0 = <&sdc_default_state>;
>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> index d20f3c7383f5..2f300cbab93e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> @@ -133,6 +133,11 @@
>> #size-cells = <2>;
>> ranges;
>>
>> + rpm_msg_ram: rpm@...00 {
> Since this is a part of the MMIO region and not a part of DRAM,
> we generally put this node under /soc with the compatible of
> qcom,rpm-msg-ram and without no-map.
>
> And the node name then should be sram@.
Sure, okay. Will update this in V3
>
>> + reg = <0x0 0x00060000 0x0 0x6000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> tz_region: tz@...00000 {
>> reg = <0x0 0x4a600000 0x0 0x400000>;
>> no-map;
>> @@ -768,6 +773,18 @@
>> };
>> };
>>
>> + rpm-glink {
> Alphabetically this should come before /soc.
Okay
>
> Konrad
>> + compatible = "qcom,glink-rpm";
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 168 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> + qcom,rpm-msg-ram = <&rpm_msg_ram>;
>> + mboxes = <&apcs_glb 0>;
>> +
>> + rpm_requests: glink-channel {
>> + compatible = "qcom,rpm-ipq9574";
>> + qcom,glink-channels = "rpm_requests";
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> timer {
>> compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
>> interrupts = <GIC_PPI 2 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
Best Regards,
Devi Priya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists