[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871qmkqjew.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:30:15 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>,
Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Re: [patch V3 09/33] genirq/msi: Add range
checking to msi_insert_desc()
On Mon, Feb 20 2023 at 17:11, Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:25:59AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> This patch appears to cause a regression on Macchiatobin, delaying the
> boot by about ten seconds due to all the warnings the kernel now
> produces.
>
>> @@ -136,11 +149,16 @@ static bool msi_desc_match(struct msi_de
>>
>> static bool msi_ctrl_valid(struct device *dev, struct msi_ctrl *ctrl)
>> {
>> + unsigned int hwsize;
>> +
>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ctrl->domid >= MSI_MAX_DEVICE_IRQDOMAINS ||
>> - !dev->msi.data->__domains[ctrl->domid].domain ||
>> - ctrl->first > ctrl->last ||
>> - ctrl->first > MSI_MAX_INDEX ||
>> - ctrl->last > MSI_MAX_INDEX))
>> + !dev->msi.data->__domains[ctrl->domid].domain))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + hwsize = msi_domain_get_hwsize(dev, ctrl->domid);
>
> This calls msi_get_device_domain() without taking dev->msi.data->mutex,
> resulting in the lockdep_assert_held() firing for what seems to be every
> MSI created by the Armada 8040 ICU driver, which suggests something isn't
> taking the lock as you expect. Please can you take a look and propose a
> patch to fix this regression.
Groan. I'll have a look.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists