[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16950676-fef9-a3a0-0855-e4e6637711dd@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 20:03:49 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
agross@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org
Cc: marijn.suijten@...ainline.org,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Hook up VDDMX as parent of
SM6375 VDDGX
On 13.02.2023 15:35, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> The GPU core clock requires that both VDDGX and VDDMX domains are scaled
> at the same rate at the same time (well, MX just before GX but you get
> the idea). Set MX as parent of GX to take care of that.
>
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> index 2027c820caa7..2669c9210754 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> @@ -216,11 +216,13 @@ static struct rpmpd gfx_s2b_vfc = {
> .key = KEY_FLOOR_CORNER,
> };
>
> +static struct rpmpd mx_rwmx0_lvl;
> static struct rpmpd gx_rwgx0_lvl_ao;
> static struct rpmpd gx_rwgx0_lvl = {
> .pd = { .name = "gx", },
> .peer = &gx_rwgx0_lvl_ao,
> .res_type = RPMPD_RWGX,
> + .parent = &mx_rwmx0_lvl.pd,
> .res_id = 0,
> .key = KEY_LEVEL,
> };
> @@ -228,6 +230,7 @@ static struct rpmpd gx_rwgx0_lvl = {
> static struct rpmpd gx_rwgx0_lvl_ao = {
> .pd = { .name = "gx_ao", },
> .peer = &gx_rwgx0_lvl,
> + .parent = &mx_rwmx0_lvl.pd,
This should have been mx_rwmx0_lvl_ao.pd.
Konrad
> .active_only = true,
> .res_type = RPMPD_RWGX,
> .res_id = 0,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists