lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <167700061770.3298.14628579257086462902.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2023 17:30:17 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
        alexanderduyck@...com, hawk@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] page_pool: add a comment explaining the fragment counter
 usage

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 00:21:30 +0200 you wrote:
> When reading the page_pool code the first impression is that keeping
> two separate counters, one being the page refcnt and the other being
> fragment pp_frag_count, is counter-intuitive.
> 
> However without that fragment counter we don't know when to reliably
> destroy or sync the outstanding DMA mappings.  So let's add a comment
> explaining this part.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v3] page_pool: add a comment explaining the fragment counter usage
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/4d4266e3fd32

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ