[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c09675da-5259-d8f3-77de-da54aef939d4@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 12:49:14 -0600
From: David Rhodes <drhodes@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Lucas Tanure <lucas.tanure@...labora.com>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
CC: David Rhodes <david.rhodes@...rus.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] ALSA: cs35l41: Add shared boost feature
On 2/21/23 02:28, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> David can you confirm that both sides should use MDSYNC for boost
> control source?
Both amps can use the value 'MDSYNC' for BST_CTL_SEL.
The value for the passive amp does not affect the behavior because BST_EN=0.
On 2/21/23 02:28, Lucas Tanure wrote:
>> I believe there is another change needed for the Deck, to handle the
>> 'legacy' property names instead of bst-type?
> I am working with valve to update their bios.
Great, I think that's a better solution.
Thanks,
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists