[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230221143535.3207b6ee@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:35:35 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
dcook@...ux.microsoft.com, alanau@...ux.microsoft.com,
brauner@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] tracing/user_events: Remote write ABI
On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:42:51 -0800
Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> Would you prefer I start another version and include the key maintainers
> from fs/exec.c, kernel/exit.c, and kernel/fork.c?
Yeah, you could just do a "[RESEND]" patch set, if nothing has changed (or
maybe just rebase if needed.
>
> I've added akpm and brauner in these patches. I've pinged akpm privately
> about these, but didn't get any responses.
Yeah, I think he'd rather see what others think before doing anything.
>
> It seems like Eric Biederman, Kees Cook, and linux-mm would be good
> folks to add here from get_maintainers outputs.
Sure. And yes, definitely include linux-mm.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists