lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af2a622f-033c-739a-858d-18c65f7afd17@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:51:55 -0800
From:   Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     "Wang, Xiaolei" <Xiaolei.Wang@...driver.com>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com" 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BCM54220: After the BCM54220 closes the auto-negotiation, the
 configuration forces the 1000M network port to be linked down all the time.

On 2/21/2023 11:53 AM, Doug Berger wrote:
> On 2/21/2023 11:41 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:44:44AM -0800, Doug Berger wrote:
>>> On 2/17/2023 12:06 AM, Wang, Xiaolei wrote:
>>>> hi
>>>>
>>>>       When I use the nxp-imx7 board, eth0 is connected to the PC, 
>>>> eth0 is turned off the auto-negotiation mode, and the configuration 
>>>> is forced to 10M, 100M, 1000M. When configured to force 1000M,
>>>>       The link status of phy status reg(0x1) is always 0, and the 
>>>> chip of phy is BCM54220, but I did not find the relevant datasheet 
>>>> on BCM official website, does anyone have any suggestions or the 
>>>> datasheet of BCM54220?
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> xiaolei
>>>>
>>> It is my understanding that the 1000BASE-T PHY requires peers to take on
>>> asymmetric roles and that establishment of these roles requires 
>>> negotiation
>>> which occurs during auto-negotiation. Some PHYs may allow manual 
>>> programming
>>> of these roles, but it is not standardized and tools like ethtool do not
>>> support manual specification of such details.
>>
>> Are you talking about ethtool -s 
>> [master-slave|preferred-master|preferred-slave|forced-master|forced-slave]
>>
> I am, though I was not aware of their addition to ethtool and I avoided 
> referencing them by name out of an overabundance of political 
> correctness ;).
> 
> Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
> 
>> The broadcom PHYs call genphy_config_aneg() -> __genphy_config_aneg()
>> -> genphy_setup_master_slave() which should configure this, even when
>> auto-neg is off.
> Yes, this sounds good. Perhaps Xiaolei is not setting these properly 
> when forcing 1000.
> 
Hmmm. I just revisited 802.3-2018 40.5.2 MASTER-SLAVE configuration 
resolution and I see it contains this statement:
The MASTER-SLAVE relationship shall be determined
during Auto-Negotiation using Table 40–5 with the 1000BASE-T Technology 
Ability Next Page bit
values specified in Table 40–4 and information received from the link 
partner.

So it appears that the only normative behavior requires Auto-Negotiation 
to be enabled. It seems reasonable that an implementation might allow 
the forced-master and forced-slave configurations to be applied when 
Auto-Negotiation is not enabled, but this case is outside of the 
standard so an implementation could also fail to establish a link.

>>
>>      Andrew
> Thanks again!
>      Doug

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ