[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af2a622f-033c-739a-858d-18c65f7afd17@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:51:55 -0800
From: Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "Wang, Xiaolei" <Xiaolei.Wang@...driver.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BCM54220: After the BCM54220 closes the auto-negotiation, the
configuration forces the 1000M network port to be linked down all the time.
On 2/21/2023 11:53 AM, Doug Berger wrote:
> On 2/21/2023 11:41 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:44:44AM -0800, Doug Berger wrote:
>>> On 2/17/2023 12:06 AM, Wang, Xiaolei wrote:
>>>> hi
>>>>
>>>> When I use the nxp-imx7 board, eth0 is connected to the PC,
>>>> eth0 is turned off the auto-negotiation mode, and the configuration
>>>> is forced to 10M, 100M, 1000M. When configured to force 1000M,
>>>> The link status of phy status reg(0x1) is always 0, and the
>>>> chip of phy is BCM54220, but I did not find the relevant datasheet
>>>> on BCM official website, does anyone have any suggestions or the
>>>> datasheet of BCM54220?
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> xiaolei
>>>>
>>> It is my understanding that the 1000BASE-T PHY requires peers to take on
>>> asymmetric roles and that establishment of these roles requires
>>> negotiation
>>> which occurs during auto-negotiation. Some PHYs may allow manual
>>> programming
>>> of these roles, but it is not standardized and tools like ethtool do not
>>> support manual specification of such details.
>>
>> Are you talking about ethtool -s
>> [master-slave|preferred-master|preferred-slave|forced-master|forced-slave]
>>
> I am, though I was not aware of their addition to ethtool and I avoided
> referencing them by name out of an overabundance of political
> correctness ;).
>
> Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
>
>> The broadcom PHYs call genphy_config_aneg() -> __genphy_config_aneg()
>> -> genphy_setup_master_slave() which should configure this, even when
>> auto-neg is off.
> Yes, this sounds good. Perhaps Xiaolei is not setting these properly
> when forcing 1000.
>
Hmmm. I just revisited 802.3-2018 40.5.2 MASTER-SLAVE configuration
resolution and I see it contains this statement:
The MASTER-SLAVE relationship shall be determined
during Auto-Negotiation using Table 40–5 with the 1000BASE-T Technology
Ability Next Page bit
values specified in Table 40–4 and information received from the link
partner.
So it appears that the only normative behavior requires Auto-Negotiation
to be enabled. It seems reasonable that an implementation might allow
the forced-master and forced-slave configurations to be applied when
Auto-Negotiation is not enabled, but this case is outside of the
standard so an implementation could also fail to establish a link.
>>
>> Andrew
> Thanks again!
> Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists