[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230222091026.4b440e8e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 09:10:26 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the input tree with the arm-soc
tree
Hi all,
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:39:28 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the input tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 481ac55a74c9 ("mfd: remove ucb1400 support")
>
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
>
> 2cfa7c9c55d8 ("Input: ucb1400_ts - switch to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() and pm_sleep_ptr()")
>
> from the input tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
This is now a conflict between the input-current tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists