[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230221115919.1918161-4-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 19:59:15 +0800
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
To: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shikemeng@...weicloud.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] ext4: call ext4_bg_num_gdb_[no]meta directly in ext4_num_base_meta_clusters
ext4_num_base_meta_clusters is already aware of meta_bg feature and test
if block_group is inside real meta block groups before calling
ext4_bg_num_gdb. Then ext4_bg_num_gdb will check if block group is inside
a real meta block groups again to decide either ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta or
ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa is needed.
Call ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta or ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa directly after we
check if block_group is inside a meta block groups in
ext4_num_base_meta_clusters to remove redundant check of meta block
groups in ext4_bg_num_gdb.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
---
fs/ext4/balloc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
index 22be5cd70505..9b8a32b90ddc 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -889,11 +889,11 @@ static unsigned ext4_num_base_meta_clusters(struct super_block *sb,
block_group < le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_meta_bg) *
sbi->s_desc_per_block) {
if (num) {
- num += ext4_bg_num_gdb(sb, block_group);
+ num += ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa(sb, block_group);
num += le16_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_reserved_gdt_blocks);
}
} else { /* For META_BG_BLOCK_GROUPS */
- num += ext4_bg_num_gdb(sb, block_group);
+ num += ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta(sb, block_group);
}
return EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, num);
}
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists