linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] x86/mm/pat: Clear VM_PAT if copy_p4d

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Feb 2023 12:03:54 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Wupeng Ma <mawupeng1@...wei.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, bp@...e.de,
        toshi.kani@...com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
        syzbot+5f488e922d047d8f00cc@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] x86/mm/pat: Clear VM_PAT if copy_p4d_range failed

On 2/16/23 18:56, Wupeng Ma wrote:
> dup_mm
>   dup_mmap
>     copy_page_range
>       copy_p4d_range
>         copy_pud_range
>           copy_pmd_range
>             pmd_alloc
>               __pmd_alloc
>                 pmd_alloc_one
>                   page = alloc_pages(gfp, 0);
>                     if (!page)
>                       return NULL;
>     mmput
>         exit_mmap
>           unmap_vmas
>             unmap_single_vma
>               untrack_pfn
>                 follow_phys
>                   WARN_ON_ONCE(1);

What's the point of that warning in the first place?  I can certainly
imagine follow_phys() failing for sparse mappings, for instance.  Is
there some requirement that VM_PFNMAP can't be sparse?