[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADrL8HWJW-QYe9RnsLCH_0zqo3Wn4sHvDaoBdf4WeA11AnMgbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 14:53:42 -0800
From: James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
"Zach O'Keefe" <zokeefe@...gle.com>,
Manish Mishra <manish.mishra@...anix.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Frank van der Linden <fvdl@...gle.com>,
Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/46] hugetlb: add make_huge_pte_with_shift
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 1:15 PM Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 4:28 PM James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > This allows us to make huge PTEs at shifts other than the hstate shift,
> > which will be necessary for high-granularity mappings.
> >
> > Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Thank you :)
>
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > index f74183acc521..ed1d806020de 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -5110,11 +5110,11 @@ const struct vm_operations_struct hugetlb_vm_ops = {
> > .pagesize = hugetlb_vm_op_pagesize,
> > };
> >
> > -static pte_t make_huge_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
> > - int writable)
> > +static pte_t make_huge_pte_with_shift(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + struct page *page, int writable,
> > + int shift)
>
> Nit: can this be 'unsigned int shift'. Because you're actually passing
> it an unsigned int below and there is an implicit cast there. Yes it
> will never matter, I know...
Yes I think it should be unsigned int. Thanks for the catch.
>
> > {
> > pte_t entry;
> > - unsigned int shift = huge_page_shift(hstate_vma(vma));
> >
> > if (writable) {
> > entry = huge_pte_mkwrite(huge_pte_mkdirty(mk_pte(page,
> > @@ -5128,6 +5128,14 @@ static pte_t make_huge_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
> > return entry;
> > }
> >
> > +static pte_t make_huge_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
> > + int writable)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int shift = huge_page_shift(hstate_vma(vma));
> > +
> > + return make_huge_pte_with_shift(vma, page, writable, shift);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void set_huge_ptep_writable(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > unsigned long address, pte_t *ptep)
> > {
> > --
> > 2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists