linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] locktorture: Add raw_spinlock* torture tests for PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230222225755.GW2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date:   Wed, 22 Feb 2023 14:57:55 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
Cc:     "dave@...olabs.net" <dave@...olabs.net>,
        "josh@...htriplett.org" <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locktorture: Add raw_spinlock* torture tests for
 PREEMPT_RT kernels

On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 05:04:41AM +0000, Zhang, Qiang1 wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:10:35PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> > For PREEMPT_RT kernel, the spin_lock, spin_lock_irq will converted
> > to sleepable rt_spin_lock and the interrupt related suffix for
> > spin_lock/unlock(_irq, irqsave/irqrestore) do not affect CPU's
> > interrupt state. this commit therefore add raw_spin_lock torture
> > tests, this is a strict spin lock implementation in RT kernels.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
> >
> >A nice addition!  Is this something you will be testing regularly?
> >If not, should there be additional locktorture scenarios, perhaps prefixed
> >by "RT-" to hint that they are not normally available?
> >
> >Or did you have some other plan for making use of these?
> 
> Hi Paul
> 
> Thanks for reply,  in fact, I want to enrich the test of locktorture, 
> after all, under the PREEMPT_RT kernel, we lost the test of the
> real spin lock. 

Very well, how does the following look?

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit edc9d419ee8c22821ffd664466a5cf19208c3f02
Author: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
Date:   Wed Feb 15 14:10:35 2023 +0800

    locktorture: Add raw_spinlock* torture tests for PREEMPT_RT kernels
    
    In PREEMPT_RT kernels, both spin_lock() and spin_lock_irq() are converted
    to sleepable rt_spin_lock().  This means that the interrupt related suffix
    for spin_lock/unlock(_irq, irqsave/irqrestore) do not affect the CPU's
    interrupt state. This commit therefore adds raw spin-lock torture tests.
    This in turn permits pure spin locks to be tested in PREEMPT_RT kernels.
    
    Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>

diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index 9425aff089365..ed8e5baafe49f 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -257,6 +257,61 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops spin_lock_irq_ops = {
 	.name		= "spin_lock_irq"
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(torture_raw_spinlock);
+
+static int torture_raw_spin_lock_write_lock(int tid __maybe_unused)
+__acquires(torture_raw_spinlock)
+{
+	raw_spin_lock(&torture_raw_spinlock);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void torture_raw_spin_lock_write_unlock(int tid __maybe_unused)
+__releases(torture_raw_spinlock)
+{
+	raw_spin_unlock(&torture_raw_spinlock);
+}
+
+static struct lock_torture_ops raw_spin_lock_ops = {
+	.writelock	= torture_raw_spin_lock_write_lock,
+	.write_delay	= torture_spin_lock_write_delay,
+	.task_boost	= torture_rt_boost,
+	.writeunlock	= torture_raw_spin_lock_write_unlock,
+	.readlock	= NULL,
+	.read_delay	= NULL,
+	.readunlock	= NULL,
+	.name		= "raw_spin_lock"
+};
+
+static int torture_raw_spin_lock_write_lock_irq(int tid __maybe_unused)
+__acquires(torture_raw_spinlock)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&torture_raw_spinlock, flags);
+	cxt.cur_ops->flags = flags;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void torture_raw_spin_lock_write_unlock_irq(int tid __maybe_unused)
+__releases(torture_raw_spinlock)
+{
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&torture_raw_spinlock, cxt.cur_ops->flags);
+}
+
+static struct lock_torture_ops raw_spin_lock_irq_ops = {
+	.writelock	= torture_raw_spin_lock_write_lock_irq,
+	.write_delay	= torture_spin_lock_write_delay,
+	.task_boost	= torture_rt_boost,
+	.writeunlock	= torture_raw_spin_lock_write_unlock_irq,
+	.readlock	= NULL,
+	.read_delay	= NULL,
+	.readunlock	= NULL,
+	.name		= "raw_spin_lock_irq"
+};
+#endif // #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+
 static DEFINE_RWLOCK(torture_rwlock);
 
 static int torture_rwlock_write_lock(int tid __maybe_unused)
@@ -1017,6 +1072,9 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
 	static struct lock_torture_ops *torture_ops[] = {
 		&lock_busted_ops,
 		&spin_lock_ops, &spin_lock_irq_ops,
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+		&raw_spin_lock_ops, &raw_spin_lock_irq_ops,
+#endif // #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
 		&rw_lock_ops, &rw_lock_irq_ops,
 		&mutex_lock_ops,
 		&ww_mutex_lock_ops,