[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/XiKKDLcejSYc6+@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:36:40 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Cc: shrikanth hegde <sshegde@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
svaidy@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/fair: Interleave cfs bandwidth timers for
improved single thread performance at low utilization
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 01:43:27PM -0800, Benjamin Segall wrote:
> The value should never come up, so it's just a question of if it's fine
> to call get_random_* in early contexts, which I don't know offhand.
Should be, scheduler init is quite late as things go and people have
been pushing the random init earlier and earlier.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists