[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/XmhjbbD58wi49B@li-a450e7cc-27df-11b2-a85c-b5a9ac31e8ef.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 15:25:18 +0530
From: Kautuk Consul <kconsul@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Rohan McLure <rmclure@...ux.ibm.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h: redefine rmb and
wmb to lwsync
> >> I'd have preferred with 'asm volatile' though.
> > Sorry about that! That wasn't the intent of this patch.
> > Probably another patch series should change this manner of #defining
> > assembly.
>
> Why adding new line wrong then have to have another patch to make them
> right ?
>
> When you build a new house in an old village, you first build your house
> with old materials and then you replace everything with new material ?
Sorry Christophe. I will take care next time to adhere to new
conventions.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists