[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b65a2fe2-6f68-2116-9599-2940e66d166b@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:23:09 +0000
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>,
Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>,
Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@...il.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
"open list:SYNC FILE FRAMEWORK" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/14] dma-buf/dma-fence: Add deadline awareness
On 18/02/2023 21:15, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>
> Add a way to hint to the fence signaler of an upcoming deadline, such as
> vblank, which the fence waiter would prefer not to miss. This is to aid
> the fence signaler in making power management decisions, like boosting
> frequency as the deadline approaches and awareness of missing deadlines
> so that can be factored in to the frequency scaling.
>
> v2: Drop dma_fence::deadline and related logic to filter duplicate
> deadlines, to avoid increasing dma_fence size. The fence-context
> implementation will need similar logic to track deadlines of all
> the fences on the same timeline. [ckoenig]
> v3: Clarify locking wrt. set_deadline callback
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/dma-fence.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> index 0de0482cd36e..763b32627684 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> @@ -912,6 +912,26 @@ dma_fence_wait_any_timeout(struct dma_fence **fences, uint32_t count,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_wait_any_timeout);
>
> +
> +/**
> + * dma_fence_set_deadline - set desired fence-wait deadline
> + * @fence: the fence that is to be waited on
> + * @deadline: the time by which the waiter hopes for the fence to be
> + * signaled
> + *
> + * Inform the fence signaler of an upcoming deadline, such as vblank, by
> + * which point the waiter would prefer the fence to be signaled by. This
> + * is intended to give feedback to the fence signaler to aid in power
> + * management decisions, such as boosting GPU frequency if a periodic
> + * vblank deadline is approaching.
> + */
> +void dma_fence_set_deadline(struct dma_fence *fence, ktime_t deadline)
> +{
> + if (fence->ops->set_deadline && !dma_fence_is_signaled(fence))
> + fence->ops->set_deadline(fence, deadline);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_set_deadline);
> +
> /**
> * dma_fence_describe - Dump fence describtion into seq_file
> * @fence: the 6fence to describe
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> index 775cdc0b4f24..d77f6591c453 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ enum dma_fence_flag_bits {
> DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT,
> DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT,
> DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT,
> + DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT,
Would this bit be better left out from core implementation, given how
the approach is the component which implements dma-fence has to track
the actual deadline and all?
Also taking a step back - are we all okay with starting to expand the
relatively simple core synchronisation primitive with side channel data
like this? What would be the criteria for what side channel data would
be acceptable? Taking note the thing lives outside drivers/gpu/.
Regards,
Tvrtko
> DMA_FENCE_FLAG_USER_BITS, /* must always be last member */
> };
>
> @@ -257,6 +258,23 @@ struct dma_fence_ops {
> */
> void (*timeline_value_str)(struct dma_fence *fence,
> char *str, int size);
> +
> + /**
> + * @set_deadline:
> + *
> + * Callback to allow a fence waiter to inform the fence signaler of
> + * an upcoming deadline, such as vblank, by which point the waiter
> + * would prefer the fence to be signaled by. This is intended to
> + * give feedback to the fence signaler to aid in power management
> + * decisions, such as boosting GPU frequency.
> + *
> + * This is called without &dma_fence.lock held, it can be called
> + * multiple times and from any context. Locking is up to the callee
> + * if it has some state to manage.
> + *
> + * This callback is optional.
> + */
> + void (*set_deadline)(struct dma_fence *fence, ktime_t deadline);
> };
>
> void dma_fence_init(struct dma_fence *fence, const struct dma_fence_ops *ops,
> @@ -583,6 +601,8 @@ static inline signed long dma_fence_wait(struct dma_fence *fence, bool intr)
> return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> }
>
> +void dma_fence_set_deadline(struct dma_fence *fence, ktime_t deadline);
> +
> struct dma_fence *dma_fence_get_stub(void);
> struct dma_fence *dma_fence_allocate_private_stub(void);
> u64 dma_fence_context_alloc(unsigned num);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists