[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4a72b25-2db3-21c4-c8c0-bb027db59d61@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 05:46:43 -0500
From: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@....com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>,
Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>,
Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@...il.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/14] drm/atomic-helper: Set fence deadline for vblank
On 2023-02-18 16:15, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>
> For an atomic commit updating a single CRTC (ie. a pageflip) calculate
> the next vblank time, and inform the fence(s) of that deadline.
>
> v2: Comment typo fix (danvet)
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> index d579fd8f7cb8..35a4dc714920 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> @@ -1511,6 +1511,40 @@ void drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables(struct drm_device *dev,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables);
>
> +/*
> + * For atomic updates which touch just a single CRTC, calculate the time of the
> + * next vblank, and inform all the fences of the deadline.
> + */
> +static void set_fence_deadline(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc, *wait_crtc = NULL;
> + struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> + struct drm_plane *plane;
> + struct drm_plane_state *new_plane_state;
> + ktime_t vbltime;
I've not looked at the latest language spec, but is AFAIR "vbltime"
would be uninitialized here. Has this changed?
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_new_crtc_in_state (state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
> + if (wait_crtc)
> + return;
> + wait_crtc = crtc;
> + }
> +
> + /* If no CRTCs updated, then nothing to do: */
> + if (!wait_crtc)
> + return;
> +
> + if (drm_crtc_next_vblank_time(wait_crtc, &vbltime))
> + return;
We have a problem here in that we're adding the time remaining to the next
vblank event to an uninitialized local variable. As per my comment on patch 10,
I'd rather drm_crtc_next_vblank_time() yield the time remaining to the vblank event,
and we can do the arithmetic locally here in this function.
--
Regards,
Luben
> +
> + for_each_new_plane_in_state (state, plane, new_plane_state, i) {
> + if (!new_plane_state->fence)
> + continue;
> + dma_fence_set_deadline(new_plane_state->fence, vbltime);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /**
> * drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_fences - wait for fences stashed in plane state
> * @dev: DRM device
> @@ -1540,6 +1574,8 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_fences(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct drm_plane_state *new_plane_state;
> int i, ret;
>
> + set_fence_deadline(dev, state);
> +
> for_each_new_plane_in_state(state, plane, new_plane_state, i) {
> if (!new_plane_state->fence)
> continue;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists