lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Feb 2023 17:44:08 +0100
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:     "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH v3] x86: Use `get_random_u8' for kernel stack offset randomization

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 9:43 PM H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> No, I do indeed agree. We're talking something that is a part of an operation that is already fairly expensive. Now, if RDRAND is available on the hardware then that could be used if someone really wants it to go faster... but get_random_*() seems saner than doing ad hoc hacks.

Do you want to go ahead and apply Maciej's patch in [1] then?

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.DEB.2.21.2301302011150.55843@angie.orcam.me.uk/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ