linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 24/35] mm: introduce vma detached flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230223200800.5cydej7s2ybafuaf@revolver>
Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2023 15:08:00 -0500
From:   "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
To:     Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, michel@...pinasse.org,
        jglisse@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
        hannes@...xchg.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net, dave@...olabs.net,
        willy@...radead.org, peterz@...radead.org, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com,
        paulmck@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
        luto@...nel.org, songliubraving@...com, peterx@...hat.com,
        david@...hat.com, dhowells@...hat.com, hughd@...gle.com,
        bigeasy@...utronix.de, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev,
        punit.agrawal@...edance.com, lstoakes@...il.com,
        peterjung1337@...il.com, rientjes@...gle.com, chriscli@...gle.com,
        axelrasmussen@...gle.com, joelaf@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com,
        rppt@...nel.org, jannh@...gle.com, shakeelb@...gle.com,
        tatashin@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com, gthelen@...gle.com,
        gurua@...gle.com, arjunroy@...gle.com, soheil@...gle.com,
        leewalsh@...gle.com, posk@...gle.com,
        michalechner92@...glemail.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/35] mm: introduce vma detached flag


Can we change this to active/inactive?  I think there is potential for
reusing this functionality to even larger degrees and that name would
fit better and would still make sense in this context.

ie: vma_mark_active() and vma_mark_inactive() ?

* Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com> [230216 00:18]:
> Per-vma locking mechanism will search for VMA under RCU protection and
> then after locking it, has to ensure it was not removed from the VMA
> tree after we found it. To make this check efficient, introduce a
> vma->detached flag to mark VMAs which were removed from the VMA tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h       | 11 +++++++++++
>  include/linux/mm_types.h |  3 +++
>  mm/mmap.c                |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index f4f702224ec5..3f98344f829c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -693,6 +693,14 @@ static inline void vma_assert_write_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  	VM_BUG_ON_VMA(vma->vm_lock_seq != READ_ONCE(vma->vm_mm->mm_lock_seq), vma);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void vma_mark_detached(struct vm_area_struct *vma, bool detached)
> +{
> +	/* When detaching vma should be write-locked */
> +	if (detached)
> +		vma_assert_write_locked(vma);
> +	vma->detached = detached;
> +}
> +
>  #else /* CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK */
>  
>  static inline void vma_init_lock(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
> @@ -701,6 +709,8 @@ static inline bool vma_start_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  static inline void vma_end_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
>  static inline void vma_start_write(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
>  static inline void vma_assert_write_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
> +static inline void vma_mark_detached(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +				     bool detached) {}
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK */
>  
> @@ -712,6 +722,7 @@ static inline void vma_init(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	vma->vm_mm = mm;
>  	vma->vm_ops = &dummy_vm_ops;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->anon_vma_chain);
> +	vma_mark_detached(vma, false);
>  	vma_init_lock(vma);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index e268723eaf44..939f4f5a1115 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -511,6 +511,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
>  	int vm_lock_seq;
>  	struct rw_semaphore lock;
> +
> +	/* Flag to indicate areas detached from the mm->mm_mt tree */
> +	bool detached;
>  #endif
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 801608726be8..adf40177e68f 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ static inline void vma_complete(struct vma_prepare *vp,
>  
>  	if (vp->remove) {
>  again:
> +		vma_mark_detached(vp->remove, true);
>  		if (vp->file) {
>  			uprobe_munmap(vp->remove, vp->remove->vm_start,
>  				      vp->remove->vm_end);
> @@ -2267,6 +2268,7 @@ static inline int munmap_sidetree(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	if (mas_store_gfp(mas_detach, vma, GFP_KERNEL))
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	vma_mark_detached(vma, true);
>  	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
>  		vma->vm_mm->locked_vm -= vma_pages(vma);
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.1
>