linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/8] dt-bindings: leds: register-bit-led: Add active-low property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkda8QQZrUkcKKvQ1z1u9X-uOrL-VAVgfkrgU3E+ihJ-YDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2023 21:59:37 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        soc@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/8] dt-bindings: leds: register-bit-led: Add
 active-low property

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 5:48 PM Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 23 February 2023 14:22:52 Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jan 2023, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 26 Dec 2022, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >
> > > > Allow to define inverted logic (0 - enable LED, 1 - disable LED) via
> > > > active-low property.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/register-bit-led.yaml | 5 +++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > Needs a DT Ack (now Cc:ed)
> >
> > I can't do anything with this set until we have a DT Ack.
> >
> > If you don't receive one soon, I'd suggest resending the set again with
> > all of the DT people on Cc that it should have been sent to in the first
> > place.
>
> (Re)Sending one email multiple times is against email etiquette,
> moreover it is spam technique and reason for marking sender on the
> blacklist.

No problem on the kernel mailing lists actually, we love to mail
bomb each other here. Yeah maybe we are a bit weird :/

> Moreover I have already sent it more than one time. DT people are known
> to not respond to patches and pull requests and I have no motivation to
> send reminder emails for them for more than half of year.
>
> So I would suggest to not send emails to people who just do not want to
> receive or read emails. It is logical reaction.
>
> This patch is here for more than 6 months, so I do not see reason why to
> wait for Godot. Rather move forward than stepping at the same position.

I understand that it is annoying.

In my experience Krzysztof and Rob (now added on To) are usually
quite responsive and helpful, so something must have made them
miss it I think.

As subsystem maintainer, if the DT reviewers haven't said anything
in ~2 weeks I tend to sanity check the binding as best I can and then
merge it. The bigger and more complex it is the more hesitant I get to
do this...

Yours,
Linus Walleij