| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTQHe9aNU86FUBrz4Ljyg5vSWH2yV_=NM+Kynmc7G75wQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 07:20:34 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Zong Li <zongbox@...il.com>
Cc: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>, anup@...infault.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
conor.dooley@...rochip.com, heiko@...ech.de,
philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu, alex@...ti.fr, hch@....de,
ajones@...tanamicro.com, gary@...yguo.net, jszhang@...nel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] riscv: asid: Fixup stale TLB entry cause application crash
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 1:58 AM Zong Li <zongbox@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> 於 2022年12月23日 週五 下午8:54寫道：
> >
> > Hi Guo,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 8:00 AM <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > >
> > > After use_asid_allocator is enabled, the userspace application will
> > > crash by stale TLB entries. Because only using cpumask_clear_cpu without
> > > local_flush_tlb_all couldn't guarantee CPU's TLB entries were fresh.
> > > Then set_mm_asid would cause the user space application to get a stale
> > > value by stale TLB entry, but set_mm_noasid is okay.
> > >
> > > Here is the symptom of the bug:
> > > unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 (coredump)
> > > 0x0000003fd6d22524 <+4>: auipc s0,0x70
> > > 0x0000003fd6d22528 <+8>: ld s0,-148(s0) # 0x3fd6d92490
> > > => 0x0000003fd6d2252c <+12>: ld a5,0(s0)
> > > (gdb) i r s0
> > > s0 0x8082ed1cc3198b21 0x8082ed1cc3198b21
> > > (gdb) x /2x 0x3fd6d92490
> > > 0x3fd6d92490: 0xd80ac8a8 0x0000003f
> > > The core dump file shows that register s0 is wrong, but the value in
> > > memory is correct. Because 'ld s0, -148(s0)' used a stale mapping entry
> > > in TLB and got a wrong result from an incorrect physical address.
> > >
> > > When the task ran on CPU0, which loaded/speculative-loaded the value of
> > > address(0x3fd6d92490), then the first version of the mapping entry was
> > > PTWed into CPU0's TLB.
> > > When the task switched from CPU0 to CPU1 (No local_tlb_flush_all here by
> > > asid), it happened to write a value on the address (0x3fd6d92490). It
> > > caused do_page_fault -> wp_page_copy -> ptep_clear_flush ->
> > > ptep_get_and_clear & flush_tlb_page.
> > > The flush_tlb_page used mm_cpumask(mm) to determine which CPUs need TLB
> > > flush, but CPU0 had cleared the CPU0's mm_cpumask in the previous
> > > switch_mm. So we only flushed the CPU1 TLB and set the second version
> > > mapping of the PTE. When the task switched from CPU1 to CPU0 again, CPU0
> > > still used a stale TLB mapping entry which contained a wrong target
> > > physical address. It raised a bug when the task happened to read that
> > > value.
> > >
> > > CPU0 CPU1
> > > - switch 'task' in
> > > - read addr (Fill stale mapping
> > > entry into TLB)
> > > - switch 'task' out (no tlb_flush)
> > > - switch 'task' in (no tlb_flush)
> > > - write addr cause pagefault
> > > do_page_fault() (change to
> > > new addr mapping)
> > > wp_page_copy()
> > > ptep_clear_flush()
> > > ptep_get_and_clear()
> > > & flush_tlb_page()
> > > write new value into addr
> > > - switch 'task' out (no tlb_flush)
> > > - switch 'task' in (no tlb_flush)
> > > - read addr again (Use stale
> > > mapping entry in TLB)
> > > get wrong value from old phyical
> > > addr, BUG!
> > >
> > > The solution is to keep all CPUs' footmarks of cpumask(mm) in switch_mm,
> > > which could guarantee to invalidate all stale TLB entries during TLB
> > > flush.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 65d4b9c53017 ("RISC-V: Implement ASID allocator")
> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
> > > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v3:
> > > - Move set/clear cpumask(mm) into set_mm (Make code more pretty
> > > with Andrew's advice)
> > > - Optimize comment description
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - Fixup nommu compile problem (Thx Conor, Also Reported-by: kernel
> > > test robot <lkp@...el.com>)
> > > - Keep cpumask_clear_cpu for noasid
> > > ---
> > > arch/riscv/mm/context.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > As reported on the patch [0] I was seeing consistent failures on the
> > RZ/Five SoC while running bonnie++ utility. After applying this patch
> > on top of Palmer's for-next branch (eb67d239f3aa) I am no longer
> > seeing this issue.
> >
> > Tested-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >
> > [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20220829205219.283543-1-geomatsi@gmail.com/
> >
>
> Hi all,
> I got the same situation (i.e. unhandle signal 11) on our internal
> multi-core system, I tried the patch[0] & [1], but it still doesn't
> work, I guess there are still some potential problems. After applying
> this patch, the situation disappeared, I took some time to look at
> other arches' implementations, such as arc, they don't clear the
> mm_cpumask due to the similar issue. I can't say which approach might
> be better, but I'd like to point out that this patch works to me.
> Thanks.
Thx for the report.
I think the patch is simpler and more direct to the problem than the
current fixup approach. Although the maintainer thought it was a
temporary solution.
This patch has been tested in our production environment for huge
amounts of thousand of hours. You can trust it :)
>
> Tested-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220829205219.283543-1-geomatsi@gmail.com/
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230129211818.686557-1-geomatsi@gmail.com/
>
> > Cheers,
> > Prabhakar
> >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
> > > index 7acbfbd14557..0f784e3d307b 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
> > > @@ -205,12 +205,24 @@ static void set_mm_noasid(struct mm_struct *mm)
> > > local_flush_tlb_all();
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static inline void set_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int cpu)
> > > +static inline void set_mm(struct mm_struct *prev,
> > > + struct mm_struct *next, unsigned int cpu)
> > > {
> > > - if (static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator))
> > > - set_mm_asid(mm, cpu);
> > > - else
> > > - set_mm_noasid(mm);
> > > + /*
> > > + * The mm_cpumask indicates which harts' TLBs contain the virtual
> > > + * address mapping of the mm. Compared to noasid, using asid
> > > + * can't guarantee that stale TLB entries are invalidated because
> > > + * the asid mechanism wouldn't flush TLB for every switch_mm for
> > > + * performance. So when using asid, keep all CPUs footmarks in
> > > + * cpumask() until mm reset.
> > > + */
> > > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
> > > + if (static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator)) {
> > > + set_mm_asid(next, cpu);
> > > + } else {
> > > + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev));
> > > + set_mm_noasid(next);
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int __init asids_init(void)
> > > @@ -264,7 +276,8 @@ static int __init asids_init(void)
> > > }
> > > early_initcall(asids_init);
> > > #else
> > > -static inline void set_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int cpu)
> > > +static inline void set_mm(struct mm_struct *prev,
> > > + struct mm_struct *next, unsigned int cpu)
> > > {
> > > /* Nothing to do here when there is no MMU */
> > > }
> > > @@ -317,10 +330,7 @@ void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
> > > */
> > > cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > >
> > > - cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev));
> > > - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
> > > -
> > > - set_mm(next, cpu);
> > > + set_mm(prev, next, cpu);
> > >
> > > flush_icache_deferred(next, cpu);
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.36.1
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-riscv mailing list
> > > linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
Powered by blists - more mailing lists