[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e26e06a-37af-8905-5b87-d1f96a74ab67@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 11:14:00 +0800
From: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@...wei.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<tiwai@...e.de>, <jolsa@...nel.org>, <vbabka@...e.cz>,
<keescook@...omium.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <acme@...nel.org>,
<namhyung@...nel.org>, <bp@...en8.de>, <bhe@...hat.com>,
<eric.devolder@...cle.com>, <hpa@...or.com>, <jroedel@...e.de>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <liwei391@...wei.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>, <liaochang1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4] x86/kdump: terminate watchdog NMI interrupt to
avoid kdump crashes
在 2023/2/23 10:29, Zeng Heng 写道:
>
> 在 2023/2/23 2:39, Eric W. Biederman 写道:
>> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 08:06:04PM +0800, Zeng Heng wrote:
>>>> If the cpu panics within the NMI interrupt context, there could be
>>>> unhandled NMI interrupts in the background which are blocked by
>>>> processor
>>>> until next IRET instruction executes. Since that, it prevents nested
>>>> NMI handler execution.
>>>>
>>>> In case of IRET execution during kdump reboot and no proper NMIs
>>>> handler
>>>> registered at that point (such as during EFI loader)
>> EFI loader? kexec on panic is supposed to be kernel to kernel.
>> If someone is getting EFI involved that is a bug.
>
> In kdump path, kexec would start purgatory to verify the secondary
> kernel by
>
> sha256. If verify passed, it would turn the control to EFI loader, and
> call the second
>
> kernel to capture the environment as vmcore file.
>
> As the mail said, if panic appears within NMI context, we never exit
> from that until
>
> EFI loader handles page fault exception and executes IRET instruction
> when exit
>
> from PF. At this moment, processor would allow the blocked NMI
> interrupt raise.
>
>
>>> This kills all of perf, including but not limited to the hardware
>>> watchdog. However, it does nothing to external NMI sources like the NMI
>>> button found on some HP machines.
>>>
>>> Still I suppose it is sufficient for the normal case.
>> I can't think of one why we don't just leave
>> NMIs deliberately disabled
>
Inative_machine_crash_shutdown() has called lapic_shutdown() to disable
any kind of
irq, but EFI loader assumes there is no any residual NMIs in the background.
Here is the first version for this issue:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230110102745.2514694-1-zengheng4@huawei.com/
Zeng Heng
>
>> until the crash recover kernel figured out how to enable them safely.
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists