[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/bqtlbnWkKMIJI4@debian.me>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 11:25:26 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Dylan Le <self@...anle.dev>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: gpu: add acceleration node section
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 02:52:52AM +0000, Dylan Le wrote:
>
> This patch was initially written for the Linux Kernel Bug Fixing Mentorship
> program. The patch adds a temporarily stubbed section on Acceleration Nodes
> to resolve a documentation warning.
>
> This resolves the warning:
> ./Documentation/gpu/drm-internals:179: ./include/drm/drm_file.h:411: WARNING: undefined label: drm_accel_node
Please write the patch description in imperative mood ("Do foo" instead
of "This patch does foo").
>
> I would appreciate any feedback on what should be documented here.
I think above is better placed between the three dashes and diffstat ...
> ---
like here.
> Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> +.. _drm_accel_node:
> +
> +Acceleration nodes
> +==================
> +
> +.. note::
> + There is not any documentation yet need to figure out what this is.
I'd like to write this stub as generic .. admonition:: block [1] instead,
with the content which is "This section is empty, add appropriate
documentation here." or similar.
[1]: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#generic-admonition
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists