| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CABVgOSmJRxCT=NZ7ZWMwCrpHJHnHBAa=XmuNcLAJd_FrBvMZBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 13:51:43 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
Cc: brendanhiggins@...gle.com, dlatypov@...gle.com,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] kunit: fix bug of extra newline characters in
debugfs logs
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 02:27, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Fix bug of the extra newline characters in debugfs logs. When a line is
> added to debugfs with a newline character at the end, an extra line appears
> in the debugfs log.
>
> This is due to a discrepancy between how the lines are printed and how they
> are added to the logs. Remove this discrepancy by checking if the a newline
Nit: "if the a"?
> character is present before adding a newline character to the log. This
> should closely match the printk behavior.
>
> Add kunit_log_newline_test to provide test coverage for this issue. (Also,
> move kunit_log_test above suite definition to remove the unnecessary
> declaration prior to the suite definition)
>
> As an example, say we add these two lines to the log:
>
> kunit_log(..., “KTAP version 1\n”);
> kunit_log(..., “1..1”);
Nit: Please use regular quotes here ("), rather than the "smart quotes" (“”).
>
> The debugfs log before this fix:
>
> KTAP version 1
>
> 1..1
>
> The debugfs log after this fix:
>
> KTAP version 1
> 1..1
>
> Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
> ---
>
This overall seems better. I haven't finished reviewing the series
yet, but there are a few obvious issues with this patch still...
Most notably, kunit-log-test.kunit_log_test now fails.
-- David
> Changes from v1 -> v2:
> - Changed the way extra newlines are removed. Instead of removing extra
> newline characters, add a newline if one is not present. This is a bit
> cleaner.
> - Add before and after results to the commit message.
> - Note: I looked into using KERN_CONT to match the printk behavior to
> vsnprintf but this could cause issues with KTAP printing on the same line
> as interrupting kernel messages. I also looked at adding KERN_CONT
> functionality to kunit_log and I did get this to work but it was a bit
> messy because it required a few calls to kunit_log_newline in
> kunit_run_tests. If this is very desired functionality, happy to add this
> to version 3.
>
> include/kunit/test.h | 9 ++++++++-
> lib/kunit/kunit-test.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> lib/kunit/test.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> index 0668d29f3453..3031ad29718b 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
> @@ -375,6 +375,13 @@ static inline void *kunit_kcalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t n, size_t size, gfp
>
> void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test);
>
> +/**
> + * kunit_log_newline() - Add newline to the end of log if not already
> + * present at the end of the log.
> + * @log: The log to add the newline to.
> + */
> +void kunit_log_newline(char *log);
> +
I don't think this function needs to be public. Maybe keep it static
and internal to test.c?
> void __printf(2, 3) kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...);
>
> /**
> @@ -420,7 +427,7 @@ void __printf(2, 3) kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...);
> #define kunit_log(lvl, test_or_suite, fmt, ...) \
> do { \
> printk(lvl fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> - kunit_log_append((test_or_suite)->log, fmt "\n", \
> + kunit_log_append((test_or_suite)->log, fmt, \
> ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> } while (0)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
> index 4df0335d0d06..b63595d3e241 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
> @@ -443,18 +443,6 @@ static struct kunit_suite kunit_resource_test_suite = {
> .test_cases = kunit_resource_test_cases,
> };
>
> -static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test);
> -
> -static struct kunit_case kunit_log_test_cases[] = {
> - KUNIT_CASE(kunit_log_test),
> - {}
> -};
> -
> -static struct kunit_suite kunit_log_test_suite = {
> - .name = "kunit-log-test",
> - .test_cases = kunit_log_test_cases,
> -};
> -
> static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct kunit_suite suite;
> @@ -481,6 +469,29 @@ static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test)
> #endif
> }
>
> +static void kunit_log_newline_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + kunit_info(test, "Add newline\n");
> + if (test->log) {
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL_MSG(test, strstr(test->log, "Add newline\n"),
> + "Missing log line, full log:\n%s", test->log);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, strstr(test->log, "Add newline\n\n"));
> + } else {
> + kunit_skip(test, "only useful when debugfs is enabled");
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case kunit_log_test_cases[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_log_test),
This test is failing now:
[13:42:51] =============== kunit-log-test (2 subtests) ================
[13:42:51] put this in log.
[13:42:51] this too.
[13:42:51] add to suite log.
[13:42:51] along with this.
[13:42:51] # kunit_log_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at
lib/kunit/kunit-test.c:459
[13:42:51] Expected strstr(test->log, "put this in log.") is not
null, but is
[13:42:51] # kunit_log_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at
lib/kunit/kunit-test.c:461
[13:42:51] Expected strstr(test->log, "this too.") is not null, but is
[13:42:51] # kunit_log_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at
lib/kunit/kunit-test.c:463
[13:42:51] Expected strstr(suite.log, "add to suite log.") is not
null, but is
[13:42:51] # kunit_log_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at
lib/kunit/kunit-test.c:465
[13:42:51] Expected strstr(suite.log, "along with this.") is not
null, but is
[13:42:51] [FAILED] kunit_log_test
[13:42:51] [PASSED] kunit_log_newline_test
[13:42:51] # kunit-log-test: pass:1 fail:1 skip:0 total:2
[13:42:51] # Totals: pass:1 fail:1 skip:0 total:2
[13:42:51] ================= [FAILED] kunit-log-test ==================
> + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_log_newline_test),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite kunit_log_test_suite = {
> + .name = "kunit-log-test",
> + .test_cases = kunit_log_test_cases,
> +};
> +
> static void kunit_status_set_failure_test(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct kunit fake;
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
> index fb6b39cca0ae..1ea981392af3 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
> @@ -108,6 +108,17 @@ static void kunit_print_test_stats(struct kunit *test,
> stats.total);
> }
>
> +void kunit_log_newline(char *log)
> +{
> + int log_len, len_left;
> +
> + log_len = strlen(log);
> + len_left = KUNIT_LOG_SIZE - log_len - 1;
> +
> + if (log_len > 0 && log[log_len - 1] != '\n')
> + strncat(log, "\n", len_left);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Append formatted message to log, size of which is limited to
> * KUNIT_LOG_SIZE bytes (including null terminating byte).
> @@ -134,6 +145,9 @@ void kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...)
> va_start(args, fmt);
> vsnprintf(log + log_len, min(len, len_left), fmt, args);
> va_end(args);
> +
> + /* Add newline to end of log if not already present. */
> + kunit_log_newline(log);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_log_append);
>
> --
> 2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog
>
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4003 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists